http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk

THE CITY

When people think of England such terms as 'Great Britain,' 'The Queen,'

'The Crown,' 'Crown Colonies,' 'London,' 'The City of London,' and 'British

Empire' come to mind and blend together into an indistinguishable blur.

They are generally looked upon as synonymous, as being representative of the

same basic system. During the 1950s and 1960s the author lived in England

(London for five years) without even beginning to realize the vast

difference that exists in the meaning of some of the above terms.

When people hear of 'The Crown' they automatically think of the King or

Queen; when they hear of 'London' or the 'The City' they instantly think of

the capital of England in which the monarch has his or her official

residence.

To fully understand the unique and generally unknown subject we must define

our terms:

When we speak of 'The City' we are in fact referring to a privately owned

Corporation - or Sovereign State - occupying an irregular rectangle of 677

acres and located right in the heart of the 610 square mile 'Greater London'

area. The population of 'The City' is listed at just over four thousand,

whereas the population of 'Greater London' (32 boroughs) is approximately

seven and a half million.

The 'Crown' is a committee of twelve to fourteen men who rule the

independent sovereign state known as London or 'The City.' 'The City' is

not part of England. It is not subject to the Sovereign. It is not under

the rule of the British parliament. Like the Vatican in Rome, it is a

separate, independent state. It is the Vatican of the commercial world.

The City, which is often called "the wealthiest square mile on earth," is

ruled over by a Lord Mayor. Here are grouped together Britain's great

financial and commercial institutions: Wealthy banks, dominated by the

privately-owned (Rothschild controlled) Bank of England, Lloyd's of London,

the London Stock Exchange, and the offices of most of the leading

international trading concerns. [Such as the British Invisibles, I kid you

not]. Here, also, is located Fleet Street, the heart and core of the

newspaper and publishing worlds.

TWO MONARCHS

The Lord Mayor, who is elected for a one year stint, is the monarch in the

City. As Aubrey Menen says in "London", Time-Life, 1976, p. 16: "The

relation of this monarch of the City to the monarch of the realm [Queen] is

curious and tells much." It certainly is and certainly does !

When the Queen of England goes to visit the City she is met by the Lord

Mayor at Temple Bar, the symbolic gate of the City. She bows and asks for

permission to enter his private, sovereign State. During such State visits

"the Lord Mayor in his robes and chain, and his entourage in medieval

costume, outshines the royal party, which can dress up no further than

service uniforms." The Lord Mayor leads the queen into his city.

The reason should be clear. The Lord Mayor is the monarch. The Queen is

his subject ! The monarch always leads the way. The subject always stays a

pace or two behind !

The small clique who rule the City dictate to the British Parliament. It

tells them what to do, and when. In theory Britain is ruled by a Prime

Minister and a Cabinet of close advisers. These 'fronts' go to great

lengths to create the impression that they are running the show but, in

reality, they are mere puppets whose strings are pulled by the shadowy

characters who dominate behind the scenes. As the former British Prime

Minister of England during the late 1800s Benjamin D'israeli wrote: "So you

see... the world is governed by very different personages from what is

imagined by those who are not behind the scenes" (Coningsby, The Century

Co., N.Y., 1907, p. 233).

This fact is further demonstrated by another passage from Menen's book: "The

Prime Minister, a busy politician, is not expected to understand the

mysteries of high finance, while the Chancellor of the Exchequer [Budget

Director] is only expected to understand them when he introduces the budget.

Both are advised by the permanent officials of the Treasury, and these

listen to the City. If they suspect that some policy of the government will

[back-fire]... it is no use their calling up British ambassadors to ask if

it is so; they can find out more quickly from the City. As one ambassador

complained to me, diplomats are nowadays no more than office boys, and slow

ones at that.

"The City will know. They will tell the Treasury and the Treasury will tell

the Prime Minister. Woe betide him if he does not listen. The most striking

instance of this happened in recent history. In 1956 the then Prime

Minister, Sir Anthony Eden... launched a war to regain the Suez Canal. It

had scarcely begun when the City let it be known that in a few days he would

have no more money to fight it; the Pound would collapse. He stopped the

war and was turned out of office by his party. When the Prime Minister

rises to address the Lord Mayor's banquet, he hopes that the City will put

more behind him than the gold plate lavishly displayed on the sideboard" (p.

18).

History clearly reveals that the British government is the bond slave of the

"invisible and inaudible" force centered in the City. The City calls the

tune. The "visible and audible leaders" are mere puppets who dance to that

tune on command. They have no power. They have no authority. In spite of

all the outward show they are mere pawns in the game being played by the

financial elite.

HISTORY of the 'CITY'

From the time of William the Conqueror until the middle of the seventeenth

century the British Monarchs ruled supreme - their word was law. They truly

were Sovereign in every sense of the word.

As British strength and influence grew around the world toward the end of

the 1600s the wealth, strength and influence of the elite merchants in the

City also grew - only at a faster pace. In 1694 the privately owned Bank of

England (a central bank) was established to finance the profligate ways of

William III. The bank was financed by a group of City merchants who used

William Paterson as a 'front.' The names of the founders have never been

made public.

It was at that juncture that the Bank of England and the City began to

dominate and control the affairs of Britain. Their influence and wealth

grew in leaps and bounds in the century that followed. "The Illustrated

Universal History," 1878, records that "Great Britain emerged from her long

contest with France with increased power and national glory. Her Empire was

greatly expanded in all parts of the world; her supremacy on the sea was

undisputed; her wealth and commerce were increased... But with all this

national prosperity, the lower classes of the English people were sunk in

extreme wretchedness and poverty, having been bled dry during the struggle

of the previous twenty years.

It was at this juncture (1815) that the House of Rothschild seized control

of the British economy, the Bank of England and the City - and, through

their other branches, control of the other European nations.

Prior to this period Britain had developed colonies and outposts in the

far-flung reaches of the globe. Having been thrown out of the Western

Hemisphere, Britain now concentrated on acquiring and developing additional

possessions elsewhere.

During its heyday in the nineteenth century approximately 90% of all

international trade was carried in British ships. Other shippers had to pay

the Crown royalties or commissions for the 'privilege' of doing business on

the high seas. During these years 'Britannia Ruled the Waves' through the

domination of the most modern and powerful navy known up to that time.

TWO SEPARATE EMPIRES

To avoid misunderstanding, it is important that the reader recognize the

fact that two separate empires were operating under the guise of the British

Empire. One was the Crown Empire and the other was the British Empire.

All the colonial possessions that were white were under the Sovereign - i.e.

under the authority of the British government. Such nations as the Union of

South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Canada were governed under British

law. These only represented thirteen percent of the people who made up the

inhabitants of the British Empire.

All the other parts of the British Empire - nations like India, Egypt,

Bermuda, Malta, Cyprus and colonies in Central Africa, Singapore, Hong Kong

and Gibraltar (those areas inhabited by the browns, yellows and blacks)

were all Crown Colonies. These were not under British rule. The British

parliament had no authority over them. They were privately owned and ruled

by a private club in London, England known as the Crown. The Crown's

representative in such areas held the absolute power of life and death over

all the people under his jurisdiction. There were no courts and no method

of appeal or retribution against a decision rendered by the representatives

of the Crown. Even a British citizen who committed a crime in a Crown

colony was subject to the Crown law. He couldn't appeal to British law as

it didn't apply.

As the Crown owned the committee known as the British government there was

no problem getting the British taxpayer to pay for naval and military forces

to maintain the Crown's supremacy in these areas. Any revolts were met with

terrible retribution by the British navy at no cost to the Crown.

The City reaped fantastic profits from its operations conducted under the

protection of the British armed forces. This wasn't British commerce and

British wealth. The international bankers, prosperous merchants and the

British aristocracy who were part of the 'City' machine accumulated vast

fortunes which they lavishly squandered in their pursuit of prestige and

standing in British Society. Had the wealth been spread out among all the

people in the British Isles prosperity would have abounded. [I am not

suggesting that this should have been done, the thefts from the exploited

should never have occurred to begin with - ralph].

In spite of the wealth of the world flowing into the City the majority of

the British people were barely making ends meet. Many were impoverished to

the point of despair. The elite lived in regal splendor. The poor British

peasants were never given a chance to get a cut of the action.

Simon Haxey in "England's Money Lords Tory M.P.," drew his readers'

attention to the "total disregard or open contempt displayed by the

aristocracy" towards the British people. He also asked, "What part do the

colonial people play in the battle for democracy when they themselves have

no democratic rights and the British governing class refuses to grant such

rights" (pp. 114,115) [we all know the difference between democracy and

republics I hope - ralph]

David Lloyd George, a future prime minister, emphasized the power of the

City and its total contempt for the "wretches" who were not part of the

'club.' In a 1910 speech he stated: "We do most of the business of the

world. We carry more international trade - probably ten times more - than

Germany. Germany carries her own trade largely. The international trade is

ours. Well, we do not do it for nothing. As a matter of fact, our shipping

brings us over a hundred millions (pounds) a year, mostly paid by that

wretched foreigner. I'm taxing the foreigner for all I know... You've heard

a good deal of talk here, probably, about the exportation of capital abroad.

There is no way in which we can make the foreigner pay more... We get the

foreigner in four ways by that. The first way we leave to Lord

Rothschild..." ("Better Times", published 1910).

About seventy years ago Vincent Cartwright Vickers stated that

"...financiers in reality took upon themselves, perhaps not the

responsibility, but certainly the power of controlling the markets of the

world and therefore the numerous relationships between one nation and

another, involving international friendship and mistrusts... Loans to

foreign countries are organized and arranged by the City of London with no

thought whatsoever of the nation's welfare but solely in order to increase

indebtedness upon which the City thrives and grows rich... This national

and mainly international dictatorship of money which plays off one country

against another and which, through ownership of a large portion of the

press, converts the advertisement of its own private opinion into a

semblance of general public opinion, cannot for much longer be permitted to

render Democratic Government a mere nickname. Today, we see through a glass

darkly; for there is so much which 'it would not be in the public interest

to divulge'..." (E.C. Knuth, "Empire of 'The City'", p. 65).

All of the above points were stressed by Roland G. Usher on pages 80, 83 and

84 of "Pan Germanism," written in 1913: "The London and Paris bankers [the

international bankers] control the available resources of the world at any

one moment, and can therefore practically permit or prevent the undertaking

of any enterprise requiring the use of more than a hundred million dollars

actual value..."

The international bankers "own probably the major part of the bonded

indebtedness of the world. Russia, Turkey, Egypt, India, China, Japan, and

South America are probably owned, so far as any nation can be owned, in

London or Paris. Payment of interest on these vast sums is secured by the

pledging of the public revenues of these countries, and, in the case of the

weaker nations, by the actual delivery of the perception into the hands of

the agents of the English and French bankers. In addition, a very large

share, if not the major part, of the stocks and industrial securities of the

world are owned by those two nations and the policies of many of the world's

enterprises dictated by their financial heads. The world itself, in fact,

pays them tribute; it actually rises in the morning to earn its living by

utilizing their capital, and occupies its days in making them still

wealthier."

In 1946 E.C. Knuth wrote: "The bulwark of the British financial oligarchy

lies in its ageless and self-perpetuating nature, its long-range planning

and prescience, its facility to outwait and break the patience of its

opponents. The transient and temporal statesmen of Europe and particularly

of Britain itself, who have attempted to curb this monstrosity, have all

been defeated by their limited tenure of confidence. Obligated to show

action and results in a too short span of years, they have been outwitted

and outwaited, deluged with irritants and difficulties; eventually obliged

to temporize and retreat. There are few who have opposed them in Britain

and America, without coming to a disgraceful end, but many, who served them

well, have also profited well" ("Empire of 'The City,'" p. 65).

====== END of CHAPTER 6 from the book "DESCENT into SLAVERY", by Des Griffin

You have just completed reading the sixth chapter of ""DESCENT into

SLAVERY", by Des Griffin. If you would like to obtain a copy of this

excellent book, send email to: [protected]

Eric Hoffer's

"True Believer"

Table of Contents

Chapter One

The Desire for Change

It is a truism that many who join a rising revolutionary movement are attracted by the prospect of sudden and spectacular change in their conditions of life. A revolutionary movement is a conspicuous instrument of change.

Not so obvious is the fact that religious and nationalist movements too can be vehicles of change. Some kind of widespread enthusiasm or excitement is apparently needed for the realization of vast and rapid change, and it does not seem to matter whether the exhilaration is derived from an expectation of untold riches or is generated by an active mass movement. In this country the spectacular changes since the Civil War were enacted in an atmosphere charged with the enthusiasm born of fabulous opportunities for self-advancement. Where self-advancement cannot, or is not allowed to, serve as a driving force, other sources of enthusiasm have to be found if momentous changes, such as the awakening and renovation of a stagnant society or radical reforms in the character and pattern of life of a community, are to be realized and perpetuated. Religious, revolutionary and nationalist movements are such generating plants of general enthusiasm.

In the past, religious movements were the conspicuous vehicles of change. The conservatism of a religion — its orthodoxy — is the inert coagulum of a once highly reactive sap. A rising religious movement is all change and experiment — open to new views and techniques from all quarters. Islam when it emergedwas an organizing and modernizing medium. Christianity was a civilizing and modernizing influence among the savage tribes of Europe. The Crusades and the Reformation both were crucial factors in shaking the Western world from the stagnation of the Middle Ages.

In modern times, the mass movements involved in the realization of vast and rapid change are revolutionary and nationalist — singly or in combination. Peter the Great was probably the equal, in dedication, power and ruthlessness, of many of the most successful revolutionary or nationalist leaders. Yet he failed in his chief purpose, which was to turn Russia into a Western nation. And the reason he failed was that he did not infuse the Russian masses with some soul-stirring enthusiasm. He either did not think it necessary or did not know how to make of his purpose a holy cause. It is not strange that the Bolshevik revolutionaries who wiped out the last of the Czars and Romanovs should have a sense of kinship with Peter — a Czar and a Romanov. For his purpose is now theirs, and they hope to succeed where he failed. The Bolshevik revolution may figure in history as much an attempt to modernize a sixth of the world's surface as an attempt to build a Communist economy.

The fact that both the French and the Russian revolutions turned into nationalist movements seems to indicate that in modern times nationalism is the most copious and durable source of mass enthusiasm, and that nationalist fervor must be tapped if the drastic changes projected and initiated by revolutionary enthusiasm are to be consummated. One wonders whether the difficulties encountered by the present Labor government in Britain are not partly due to the fact that the attempt to change the economy of the country and the way of life of 49,000,000 people has been initiated in an atmosphere singularly free from fervor, exaltation and wild hope. The revulsion from the ugly patterns developed by most contemporary mass movements has kept the civilized and decent leaders of the Labor party shy of revolutionary enthusiasm. The possibility still remains that events might force them to make use of some mild form of chauvinism so that in Britain too "the socialization of the nation [might have] as its natural corollary the nationalization of socialism."

The phenomenal modernization of Japan would probably not have been possible without the revivalist spirit of Japanese nationalism. It is perhaps also true that the rapid modernization of some European countries (Germany in particular) was facilitated to some extent by the upsurge and thorough diffusion of nationalist fervor. Judged by present indications, the renascence of Asia will be brought about through the instrumentality of nationalist movements rather than by other mediums. It was the rise of a genuine nationalist movement which enabled Kemal Atatürk to modernize Turkey almost overnight. In Egypt, untouched by a mass movement, modernization is slow and faltering, though its rulers, from the day of Mehmed Ali, have welcomed Western ideas, and its contacts with the West have been many and intimate. Zionism is an instrument for the renovation of a backward country and the transformation of shopkeepers and brain workers into farmers, laborers and soldiers. Had Chiang Kai-shek known how to set in motion a genuine mass movement, or at least sustain the nationalist enthusiasm kindled by the Japanese invasion, he might have been acting now as the renovator of China. Since he did not know how, he was easily shoved aside by the masters of the art of "religiofication" — the art of turning practical purposes into holy causes. It is not difficult to see why America and Britain (or any Western democracy) could not play a direct and leading role in rousing the Asiatic countries from their backwardness and stagnation: the democracies are neither inclined nor perhaps able to kindle a revivalist spirit in Asia's millions. The contribution of the Western democracies to the awakening of the East has been indirect and certainly unintended. They have kindled an enthusiasm of resentment against the West; and it is this anti-Western fervor which is at present rousing the Orient from its stagnation of centuries.

Though the desire for change is not infrequently a superficial motive, it is yet worth finding out whether a probing of this desire might not shed some light on the inner working of mass movements. We shall inquire therefore into the nature of the desire for change.

Simple:  Restore Human Robots to being Human Beings via use of Real Robots now available
Challenge:  email any objection you have to sysop@TeamInfinity.com so it can be dispelled post haste.
You really must get on board and quick, your life depends on it, literally, tick tock...
Be a part of the future now, or vanish into history, it is your choice valuable blessed friend.

If Communism is merely Capitalism perfected, which it clearly is in the minds
of the Capitalists who in fact created Communism, where EVERYTHING & EVERYONE becomes "plant
& equipment" owned by a small group of Ultra Capitalists: what does that say about Capitalism, Socialism & Communism ?

Not much...  These 3 faces of Capitalism share a common track record littered with destruction...

and Now for something completely different...

See, be, say:  the better way:

ROBOTISM© Will Succeed for PRECISELY  the Reasons Communism Failed...
...People Intelligently CHOSE to NOT Work as Human-Robots under Communism, 
real ROBOTS will have no such choice under ROBOTISM©

Capitalism = Socialism = Communism, always fail without lies and deception,
because the TRUTH is, no one wants to do the work each system requires, repeat...

Therefore, the current systems, all just different forms of Capitalism as demonstrated above,
ALL clearly incentivize anti-social, hypocritical & criminal behavior by implicitly punishing innocent behaviors.

Only The RWE© can incentivize innocent behaviors, because no one in
their right mind would risk their ability to bask in its splendor, freely available to all: via systemically
eliminating the perceived need to engage in  risk for advantage, advantage that is available without risk to anyone in a virtual sense,
without harming anyone else in reality, i.e. if your ego requires it, that illusion will be granted to the illusion you have of yourself, you can experience
that experience until your need to feel superior without being superior becomes apparent to you too.  In other words, feeling and being superior are
not the same thing, yet many fool themselves into believing they are superior to others by harming others to the point of actually becoming superior in a physical
sense, this is not fair, and now we have a way of dealing with it, without harming anyone, even those with such dangerous illusions of grandeur.

In fact ALL criminal behavior today and in the past can be thought of as premature selfish attempts to create & horde
precisely the circumstances we will ALL be blessed to be living in once The RWE© arrives in all its resplendent glory: said
behaviors were indeed counter-productive in getting us there sooner, despite being the "right" idea, i.e. the goal was laudable, only
if shared with all, otherwise the methods were, well you know enough history to know what keeps happening over and over again.

Especially today, when we are so close, we must all insist on fairness & mercy in all matters
without exception, including, of utmost importance, honest pay with real money, i.e. inherently
valuable money, which is essentially barter,  until The RWE© is completed, making money irrelevant.

Ironically, real money is only necessary to create The RWE©, for once it is built, the make-believe money we use today is fine,
but not before then, or The RWE© may never arrive for all, only those who have already achieved one using real people as their robots.

It is obvious that many feel we do not need  The RWE©
but that is only because they either already
have one based on human robots, or
are one of the human robots
and do not understand
they are
one
.

1. The robotic network is up and running, do we pay the robots for their work ?
2. The geo-thermal & Algae power plants producing FREE electricity are up, who do we pay for the electricity to power the robots & everything else requiring power when power is free ?
3. The robots are up, out & about, collecting & processing raw materials into other robots & everything else, who do we pay to collect & process raw material & distribute finished products these same robots will make & distribute ?
4. The Computer systems are up and running, who do we pay to make the decisions they will make ?
5. To answer these questions become part of the freight train of thought & action as revolution known as:

1. Humans are endowed with inalienable rights ipso facto
   
2. Current system of economy denies these rights to vast majority of humans due to its premises
3. Resolution demands fundamental change to the premises upon which current system operates
4. Current wage based economy must and will be replaced by the "ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY"
5. Society's Passive "income" will exceed its "expenses", so its members do not have to "produce" or perish.
   
6. Money exchanged for material or services will be FORBIDDEN under new system since:
1. Robotics can perform all physical labor, and
2. Computers can perform all mental labor, and
3. Material is everywhere in Universe and unlimited and,
   
4. Energy is unlimited and it's TRUE COST is ZERO
1. ERGO, cost of manufacturing   is ZERO
2. ERGO, cost of distribution      is ZERO
3. ERGO, cost of EVERYTHING  is ZERO
5. Since Cost of ALL Goods & Services is ZERO
1. ERGO, no longer shall Money be necessary since COST of everything is ZERO
2. ERGO, no longer shall humans have to "work" for other humans, when systems can do all work
   
6. Each Human's full time occupation will be to develop their own:
1. Physical  Health
2. Mental    Health
3. Spiritual  Health
4. i.e. The Age of Re-Creation - or recreation is what we are talking about 24/7/365
   
7. The majority of human's current activity is "busy work" to prop up the current facade of fairness for all
1. You know it
2. I know it
3. Start telling the truth and showing the way to true life for all where there are no losers
4. We are not talking about redistribution of wealth from one to another, which is after all a ZERO SUM GAME
   
5. We are talking about, WIN-WIN, FREE for ALL, where everyone is as Royal and as free as they want to be without hurting others
6. All other strategies are short-sighted since:
   
1. They do not address the fundamental issue of disengaging humans from the machinery of economy COMPLETELY. 
   
7. All other plans have one thing in common, they simply re-arrange the deck chairs on a sinking ship.
   
8. WARNING:  The changes we are talking about are so SUBTLE and COMPREHENSIVE that many will not understand
9. COMPREHENSION is the KEY - details follow...
   

Leopards break into the Temple and Drink the Sacrificial Chalices dry... 
This occurs repeatedly, again and again... 
Finally it can be reckoned upon beforehand and becomes part of the ceremony...

KAFKA the Magnificent


BOTH "Faith" and Terror are instruments for the elimination of individual self-respect.  

Terror crushes the autonomy of self-respect, while "Faith" obtains its more or less voluntary surrender.  

In both cases the result of the elimination of individual autonomy is -automatism.  

BOTH "Faith" and Terror reduce the human entity to a formula that can be
manipulted at will.

Eric Hoffer

• Just suppose Politics is merely "The Fine Art of Taking Credit for the Inevitable..."  think about that...
• Tell yourself, "I  can help bring about  The Inevitable Age of Recreation via ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY, SOONER..."
• Politicos can then take credit for The Inevitable Age of Recreation via ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY, thats fine !
  
• Taking credit for The Inevitable is one thing, making The Inevitable arrive sooner, is quite another!
  
• Give Politicos something WORTH TAKING Credit for,  The Inevitable Age of Recreation via ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY
• Right now, most are simply playing the same very old game, with same very old rules from early Roman times.
• Never before in Human History has it been possible for anything, OTHER THAN SYSTEMS of HUMANS , to elevate one group of people over another, i.e. create an elite leisure class
  
• Until today that is....   No longer is it necessary to coerce or otherwise trick SYSTEMS of HUMANS to do what SYSTEMS of ROBOTS  & COMPUTERS  can do today
• Give Politicos something useful to do, they really do want to do what is right, & are waiting for, YOU,  SO CALL THEM
• Free Humans from the nasty Production/Consumption Cycle by replacing their production, with 100 % Robotic production
• All human "income" will be PASSIVE INCOME, just as the elite have always done it, but this time, on the BACKS of ROBOTS
  
• ALL HUMANS will be elevated to the "Elite" level of 100% passive income, instead of just the few.
  
• INCOME will be redefined. "Money/Wages" will no longer have meaning since all work will be done by Computers & Robots.
• Capitalism & Communism only work for Capitalists & Communists !  True or True ?
  
• Can you really call yourself a Capitalist if you have no capital, or equipment etc besides your own body ?
• ROBOTISM© works for EVERYONE since, under it,  no one works.  Either FREE means FREE or it is hokum.
  
• Have you settled for a deal less than you deserve in life ?  
  
• Can you REALLY call yourself a human ?                                Or are you REALLY more like a ROBOT than Human ?
  
• Or is the deal you have signed up to fine with you, but is causing others to suffer in ways that are too subtle for you to even recognize ?
• How many thoughts are truly YOUR THOUGHTS ?  or are you carrying out someone else's plans & goals, day in, year out ?
• Is it fair to your children that you cannot spend more time with them, what is this state of affairs doing to them ?
• Are your children just another crop to be harvested by the machine ?
  
• Are you a "Human Being" or a "Human Doing", i.e. ROBOT ?
  
• What if you could, HAVE MORE FREE TIME
  
• Could you, BE MORE EFFECTIVE, and, help everyone  else, in the process
  
• "THE ECONOMY" is a huge machine/robot/THE BEAST...    and as such...
  
• You are already being controlled by a huge machine/robot and all its little machines/robots, "THE ECONOMY"
  
• NOW is the TIME to ENSLAVE the MACHINE, because it is only becoming more entrenched daily, with so many "leaders" asleep @ wheel of destiny
  
• NOW is the TIME to TRANSFORM  the "LATENT FLESH-ROBOTIC ECONOMY" into an "ACTUAL WAGELESS NON-FLESH ROBOTIC ECONOMY"
• GOOD NEWS, NOW is the TIME since, never before was it possible for ROBOTS to DO ALL WORK.  EDUCATE YOUR LEADERS to EXPECT MORE
• You were born to reach your full potential, everything anyone has done to this point is leading to the ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY
• Let your leaders know you are SOVEREIGN, & you WANT MORE, EXPECT MORE, INTELLIGENCE from them in the transformation to the new ECONOMY
  
• Should you wait till your LEADERS  ask you, or should you, TELL THEM you want them to transition us to the WAGELESS ROBOTIC ECONOMY NOW
  
• Are you so well indoctrinated that you identify yourSELF with your JOB, & that to LOSE your job, you would lose your self ?
• Are you the perfect flesh-robot and this is why this is not making sense to YOU ?  Are you asleep right now ?  How would you know ?
  
• ENSLAVE the MACHINES before it is too late...    BE a BEING, not a FLESH-ROBOT !  Perfect slaves believe they are FREE !!
  
• TRUE or TRUE ?  Read what follows 10 times verbatim, 2 days between readings. Let no one tell you what is good enough for you.
  

1. Acquire our first Island, as test bed, between 400 & 10,000 square kilometers with:
1. good representation of natural resources from periodic table's lower 93 elements
   
2. temperate zone
3. between 4 to 10 people per square kilometer average density
4. think of the Danish SAMS0 Island that today produces all its own energy [1 important piece of our puzzle]
   
1. http://w2.djh.dk/international/2001/samso/AboutSamso/index.html
5. Cuba is an excellent candidate as well
6. Virgin's CEO Sir Richard Branson's Islands of Necker, and Moskito are already moving in the MC5 direction !
   
7. Puerto Rico
8. Isle of Man, later Tasmania, New Zealand, Australia, the Earth
   
2. Enlist the help of Hollywood to produce a movie depicting:
1. the new world we will build with its "ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY & GEOTHERMAL & ALGAE ENERGY"
   
2. tell & "sell" the story
3. make it as understandable as possible to as many as possible
4. think of the production techniques in the movie "The Truman Show", starring Jim Carrey, not hard to imagine
   
3. Develop computer model to simulate algorithmically and graphically:
1. every aspect & scenario of the new economy algorithmically.  [see SIMULEX CORPORATION ]
   
2. solicit the help of recent college graduates in the following fields:
1. Computer Science, Economics, Mathematics, Space Sciences
   
2. Robotics
3. Physics, Chemistry, Nanotechnology, genetics, genomics, civil engineering
   
4. Sociology, Psychology, Political Science
3. Work with Computer Game industry to  produce a Simulation along the lines of SimEarth [see SIMULEX CORPORATION ]
4. Offer membership opportunities to interested participants:
1. Private individuals
2. Private & Public Institutions
1. non-Profits
2. for-profits with proviso that once in there is no more buying/selling
3. Government & non-governmental organizations NGOs
4. Academia
5. Deploy the Computer AI systems to:
1. design the operational support systems
2. design the robotic systems which will built all the robots
3. coordinate activities of the robots and support systems
4. design the entertainment and recreational facilities for the humans
5. continuously collect & coordinate input from the humans to decide what to do next, and next etc
   
6. Deploy the robots to build other robots that will:
1. build the "near-mantle" GeoThermal Power Plant
2. build the recycling subsystems
   
3. manufacture all physical items
   
4. perform all farming operations
5. transport all goods & raw materials
6. perform all law enforcement actions
   
7. perform all medical & rescue services
8. tend all systems of:
1. Power production
2. Water & Air purification
3. Communications
4. Manufacture
5. Transportation
9. build the centers & systems for human activities:
1. entertainment
1. comedic sciences
   
2. non & performing arts, please see: http://www.theartistsforum.org
   
3. cinema & theater
   
4. VR 
   
2. education
1. arts, languages, humanities, history
2. Astronomy
   
3. mathematics & sciences
4. spirituality
1. yoga
2. meditation
3. contemplative
4. other non-coercive & non-violent spiritual pursuits
   
5. naturalism
6. ROBOTS, possess INFINITE PATIENCE thus, they are well suited to TRAIN HUMANS
1. ROBOTs can teach new social skills and languages to:
1. AUTISTIC CHILDREN http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/09/195209
2. The Handicapped
3. The anti-social
   
3. recreation
1. parks, nature & eco-preserves
   
2. physical sports facilities
   
1. competitive and non-competitive
   
3. mental sports facilities and systems
   
1. competitive and non-competitive
7. Partner with WALMART [if this sounds crazy to you now, that is only because you do not understand yet.]  Why ?  proceed to find out...
   
1. In spite of itself, and perhaps without even knowing it, WALMART is headed in the ROBOTIC MAGNA CARTA NOVA© direction:
   
1. Walmart pays its workers almost nothing -
   
1. under MAGNA CARTA NOVA©, wages are eliminated, so Walmart is headed in correct direction with their pay practices
2. Walmart charges almost nothing for its products -
1. under MAGNA CARTA NOVA©, everything is free, so again Walmart is headed in the correct direction here with prices approaching ZERO
3. Walmart CEO stated  August  15, 2007 in NY TIMES that its customers are "running out of money !!" anyway !
1. According to:  WALMART CEO Claims "Our Customers are Running out of Money !!"  August 15, 2007 NY TIMES http://TeamInfinity.com/Communique_12539.html so it appears the trend of money ""going away" is already occurring...
   
4. Walmart is optimizing distribution, logistics & manufacturing practices with Computers and Robotics
1. under MAGNA CARTA NOVA©, ALL manufacturing, logistics & distribution will be automated and wageless with no humans involved
2. WALMART, to their credit, is rolling out GREEN STORES with integrated and GREEN TECHNOLOGIES including:
1. Solar, Wind Power  [please see NANOSOLAR - http://www.nanosolar.com/]
   
2. Solar Lighting
3. Pervious Pavement
4. Rain Water Capture for irrigation
5. Burning used motor oil as diesel for power generation
6. See: http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=34647
3. WALMART is the worlds largest RETAILER, and as such serves as an interface between PRODUCTION and CONSUMPTION
1. This is precisely the interface that we will be redesigning, it is the engine of the current economy, where the rubber meets the road under the current reality
2. Redesigning this interface with slight and subtle modifications is key to instituting MAGNA CARTA NOVA©
3. WALMART has the critical mass, the gravitas, this is where the tweaks must occur to bring MAGNA CARTA NOVA© to reality.
8. Once our test Island has succeeded for 5 years, replicate on New Zealand, then Australian, then across globe & into space
1. Into Space with Space Hotels, Universities etc, expanding humanity's big picture awareness
2. The New York Times has story of a new SPACE HOTEL being built called the GALACTIC SUITE
   

• The Age of Recreation via the Emancipation of Humanity from the Machinery of Economy via ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY

• Community Centers,
• Coastal Parks,
• Arts and Entertainment Facilities

See this link for details:

• http://www.toolbase.org/Technology-Inventory/HVAC/geothermal-heat-pumps