Keep in mind ALGAE POWER is simple, many of the videos below show more
sophisticated research programs which intend to find even better ways,
that when found, will only create even higher efficiency, point being
that even so called "low tech" algae technology is within every family's reach !!
Do not wait for someone else to do what you can do yourself TODAY, setting up your
100% Carbon Neutral Backyard ALGAE System will be fun and educational for you,
your children, and/or your friends and neighbor's children to learn how to free
us all from the Machinery of Economy !!! You need no ones permission to be FREE !!!
View each of the following videos...via ALGAE, in a backyard pond, you can produce diesel fuel....
http://youtube.com/watch?v=EnOSnJJSP5c
http://youtube.com/watch?v=hGcLgE52rzw
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4DRIg-K6kZs
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/tech/2008/06/05/washburn.230.mpg.car.kfmb
Researchers first grow algae in the lab to find the optimum growing conditions - and then scale up to mass-produce it. Credit: Joel Cuello
(PhysOrg.com) -- Algae could soon become a valuable biofuel resource, according to research at the University of Arizona.
It's green, it's slimy and it smells. It also abundantly produces lipids, sugars and sometimes hydrogen gas, all of which are sought-after sources for renewable energy. You may think of it as mere pond scum, but algae could be a highly productive biofuel crop in the near future.
More than 300 times as productive a source for renewable energy as corn, algae could be used to make biodiesel to power vehicles and industries – if it can be produced at a low enough cost to be feasible economically.
In a collaborative research effort between several departments, scientists and engineers at the University of Arizona are studying ways to optimize the production of biofuels from algae.
The challenge: How to use environmental factors to control the rate at which the algae grow and produce lipids to maximize production while also reducing the cost of resources needed to grow algae.
"Right now the cost of production still exceeds the value of the final product," said Joel Cuello, professor in the department of agricultural and biosystems engineering. "So the challenge research-wise is trying to lower the production cost while increasing algae productivity."
One way to lower production cost is to use treated secondary wastewater to grow the algae. The algae purify the water by absorbing nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, and at the same time eliminate the need to use costly fertilizers to supply the algae with nutrients.
"Wastewater has nitrates and phosphates that need to be removed anyway, so why not just feed it to the algae?" said Cuello.
Algae cells store fat as lipids, oil molecules that can be processed to make biodiesel. The researchers grow colonies of algae in flasks to test the effects of different environmental conditions on growth and lipid production.
Kimberly Ogden of the department of chemical and environmental engineering has a lab full of algae-filled flasks: "We grow the algae and then separate the lipid material that can be turned into fuel from the rest of the algae, which is mostly protein."
The goal, said Ogden, is to learn enough about the chemical structure of the oils to be able to process them into biodiesel with the same facilities currently used to process petroleum. Eventually algae oil could be blended with petroleum oil to make biodiesel.
"We use alternative water supplies and look at water recycling and reuse," said Ogden. "We don't want to use tap water – for one thing all the chlorine is probably not a good idea, and we don't want to be using the freshwater supplies."

An open pond system is one way to mass-produce algae for biofuels. Credit: Joel Cuello
One of the challenges is selecting a species that produces the right lipids at the right rate, said Mark Riley, professor and head of the department of agricultural and biosystems engineering."We can look at algae that grow very quickly, but they generally make very little oil. Or there are algae that grow really slowly, but they make a lot of oil. So the challenge is how to mix the two of those characteristics to maximize the amount of oil."
"One of the ways to try to stimulate the algae to produce a lot of lipids is to deprive them of one resource," said Riley. "The idea is to give them some sugar or a lot of sunlight, and then not give them nitrogen because they need nitrogen to make protein and they can't replicate unless they can make protein. What happens is the algae keep running photosynthesis and instead of being able to replicate they store all of those compounds inside their cells."
"Ideally what we want to do is control how the algae work so that they grow a whole lot, and then we say: ‘OK, you're done growing, now it's time to start making lipids,'" said Riley.
"We also look at life cycle assessment," said Ogden. "We look at the impact of the entire process on the environment, everything from the nutrients that the algae need, such as phosphate, nitrogen and carbon dioxide, through the actual processing. We're trying to understand how to optimize production from what we learn in the lab and apply that knowledge to methods for mass production of algae."
Obviously, if you want to produce enough biodiesel to power a truck, you're not going to get very far on a few flasks of algae.
There are two ways to mass produce algae: In outdoor open ponds or inside a container called a bioreactor.
The researchers are experimenting with the first option at an outdoor facility in Tucson, Ariz. However, controlling environmental factors becomes much more difficult with the larger-scale, outdoor operation.
"The water, the sunlight and the ambient temperature are all factors you want to keep in a fairly narrow range," said Riley. "One of the problems in these large ponds is just the temperature change from day to night. If the liquid gets too hot, then you kill the algae. If it gets too cold, then you decrease their rate of growth and their rate of metabolism."
The second option to mass-produce algae involves a bioreactor.
Cuello's lab developed a device called the accordion photobioreactor – which very loosely resembles the musical instrument – to provide a controlled environment for growing algae.
"A bioreactor is just a container or a vessel where you can control various environmental factors inside such as light, temperature and pH," said Cuello.
"So there's this long chain of events," said Riley. "We've got to grow the algae and then switch the metabolism to produce the lipids, and not just any lipids but the right lipids, then purify them and process them to make the biodiesel."
And algae don't just make lipids. Some species also are capable of producing hydrogen gas, another alternative fuel. Cuello is experimenting with one such species, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Algae only produce hydrogen gas when they're not photosynthesizing. Photosynthesis yields oxygen, which inhibits the enzyme that catalyzes the hydrogen-producing reaction.
"In order to produce hydrogen gas the oxygen needs to be depleted or markedly reduced," said Cuello. "One interesting technology in this area was developed at the University of California, Berkeley, and that's essentially depriving the algae of sulfur."
Sulfur is a component of certain amino acids and proteins the algae need for photosynthesis. Depriving the algae of sulfur stops photosynthesis so that oxygen can't be produced and the algae instead will make hydrogen gas.
"That's a great idea and it works," said Cuello. "But it's cumbersome because you have to transfer the algae from a sulfur-containing medium to a non-sulfur-containing medium to produce hydrogen gas, and then back again to allow the algae to photosynthesize and recover."
On a quest for a more efficacious method, Cuello and his team came up with a way to make the algae switch between photosynthesizing and producing hydrogen gas using light. The researchers are able to turn parts of the photosynthesizing machinery on and off by exposing them to different wavelengths of light.
"I collaborated with professor Stanley Pau in the College of Optical Sciences, who is an expert on lasers," said Cuello. "We both thought it would be interesting if we could demonstrate production of algae using a laser as the light source because no one had done that before."
Cuello and Pau were able to grow algae successfully using lasers, which can be set to very specific wavelengths to control photosynthesis. "Bottom line, the method works," said Cuello.
With continuing innovations, both open ponds and bioreactors could be used to mass-produce algae in the near future. "I would think that probably it will take another five years for biofuel production from algae to become feasible economically," said Cuello.
Swap
the
Sacrificial
Anode from
Humans
Beings to Robots
Doing
As the slack in the "system" tightens, due to
the inexorable & desirable progression of
technology, the areas where deception is
possible are disappearing, a good thing for
sure, yet this is causing the guilty &
ruthless with asymmetric systemic leverage, to
lash out at the "herd", to falsely
blame them before
themselves being accurately blamed
as it were.
They want everyone else to appear
guilty because in fact, only they are, as if in
a desperate bid to dilute the guilt they feel in
a sea of guilt, as detection of their
misdeeds are exposed to the "herd" they have
been "farming" for eons.
So this
is a natural phenomena that will continue until
the tipping point is achieved, i.e. once real
robots become the sacrificial anode instead
of the "herd" of humans as is now the
case. (see
cathodic protection)
Thus your mission is clear, your
goal is valiant, your cause just, you
must make the case to everyone you know, to
accelerate safely the sacrificial anode
transition
from human beings to robots
doing, as even the current
human farmers are subject to the pitfalls of the
current system as much as they might think to
the contrary, and thus can do much better than
the current deadly embrace of rigor mortis,
the current system provides for even them,
because in the end, they still must suffer &
die before they would like to in most cases.
Essentially, a slight tweak in the current Full
Spectrum
Dominance
System
is all that is necessary to become the Full
Spectrum
Protection
System as WE-R© proposing,
as
precisely the same technologies required in both
scenarios outside of the aforementioned tweak
which is minor in comparison to the pervasive
infrastructure back-plane entailed and nearing
completion.
This is the tipping point that will birth the death of death
itself, make sure you are involved to tip
it in the safe direction, as technology itself
is always neutral, hence how important YOU ARE,
so focus on the important stuff, YOU ARE THE REASON
EVERYTHING EXISTS, and this is true for
everyone !!!
Yes you do comprehend this, so get out "there"
and promote it,
your well being depends on your sober prudent
promotion of
this simple truth based idea, as the truth really is
always enough !!!
The past is perfect, how could it not be, make
sure
you are here for the rest to make it the best
!!!
Be well Friend, Live Long and Prosper !!!

SPECIFIC ACTIONS &
SCRIPTS to TAKE TODAY:
1. Forward this message to 5 friends specifically, then call them 1 week from then to followup.
2.
Call
& Write 5 elected officials or their staff,
and ask them specifically:
Dear
Representative of Staff {insert name}:
"Instead of creating more jobs for
humans, why not automate everything via
Systems of Robots and Computers, and have them
build out the recreation facilities for us
humans to enjoy as we "work" on our own
physical, mental, spiritual, social well
being, so we can only volunatrily, as
it suits us, help others do
the same ?
Why have you not started on
this project yet, why are you in office, isn't
what we suggest precisely what you are doing
for yourself alone, but using the system of
humans below you as your robots ?"
Enough with the half measures, we
know what the end state looks like & WE-R©
it, so lets "reverse" engineer it
together, so we all win.
Be
FIRM & CALM
Read Related:
COPY FIGHT VIDEO : COPYRIGHT
IS KILLING SCIENCE
Video is a tad tedious, no idea what he think he
means regarding "White-effect", as
truth is absolutely timeless, otherwise an okay overview of the
scope of copyright
The Architecture of
Access to Scientific Knowledge from lessig on Vimeo.
"Whereas copyright tends to focus on protecting artists'
ability to make money from their work,
scientists don't use similar incentives. And yet, her work is
often kept within the gates of the ivory
tower, reserved for those whose universities or institutions
have purchased access, often at high costs.
And for science in the age of the internet, which wants ideas
to spread as widely as possible
to encourage more creativity and development, this
isn't just bad: it's immoral."
Summary:
Intellectual Property is NEITHER !
Abolish All COPY RIGHT NOW !!!
Copy right, simply means, copy it right !
If it can be copied, it is already everyone's !!!
Open source robotics received a huge boost in momentum last Friday. Willow Garage, one of the driving forces behind the Robot Operating System, announced that it would be giving away ten of its new and extraordinary PR2 Beta Robots. The PR2 line achieved wide-spread notoriety in 2009 with its ability to plug itself into a wall outlet and recharge itself. Each PR2 Beta is a highly valued and expensive machine that represents a unique entry point to world-class robotics research. Willow Garage has an open call for proposals, so that any research group on the planet can apply to receive one of the PR2 Betas completely free of charge. That’s right, Willow Garage is giving these robots away for free. Applicants will have to release their research with the PR2 freely and under standard open source agreements. In this way, Willow Garage is accelerating the field of robotics, not just by making their PR2 Betas available, but by encouraging the shared development of robots and advocating the open source creed.
If you were a robotics developer, why would you want to apply for Willow Garage’s deal? For starters, the PR2 robot is a high quality machine. It has two sophisticated arms capable of grasping, lifting, and coordinated work. It can also see what it’s doing. According to its specs, it has two laser scanners, half a dozen cameras, and arrays of other sensors. Just as important as the hardware, however, is the software. PR2 is fully compliant with ROS, and other open source robotics code supplied by a vast community robotics experts.
In short, the PR2 Beta is a robot that any researcher would be proud to use in their lab. Gaining one through Willow Garage’s offer is akin to shaving years off of a research program. Instead of developing hardware themselves, successful applicants will be able to focus on the really cool part of their jobs: getting robots to do their bidding. Willow Garage is in essence facilitating the rapid development of useful robotics protocols. The ten research groups who receive the PR2 will help build a growing library of programs which any developer can use in their own efforts to build better robots. Did you find out a great way for a robot to identify water? Well share that with another researcher and they’ll figure out to make the robot drink. That’s the power of open source robotics.
For their part, Willow Garage is using their selection criteria to further their vision of robot development. Foremost is the emphasis on open source, but WG is also giving preference to those research teams that do not rely on military funding and that avoid military uses of their work. After being selected, a PR2 recipient will also be pulled into several community building exercises. Of course all code will have to be shared in communal ways, but there’s also going to be regular round table meetings, and teams will be encouraged to share their experiences via blogs or public forums.
Sometimes it seems that Willow Garage is going to drag the field of robotics into the open source community kicking and screaming if need be. Certainly they’ve leveraged this give-away to further shared robotics research in the short term (by giving each group a robot) and in the long term (by strengthening the open source robotics community). If the application process goes well, and the recipient groups produce some really amazing research in the next few years, this program could be repeated not only by Willow Garage, but by other major robotics labs across the world. I am thrilled by the possibility that WG could start a trend by which research groups with a lot of promise, but not a lot of funding, could compete at the highest tiers of robotics through the donation of specially developed research robots. The more groups working towards the same goal, the quicker we’ll achieve some amazing results.
To me, this program is really what Willow Garage has always been driving towards. They’re going to further the field of robotics not just by building better robots, but by developing the global infrastructure through which other teams can build better robots. I can’t wait to see who is chosen and what they do with their PR2 Betas.
Willow Garage announced its call for proposals on January 15th, and candidates only have until February 1st to send in their letters of intent. Formal proposals are on March 1st, and by April we’ll all know which teams have been selected to receive the PR2 Betas. Officially the announced number of robots to be delivered is “around 10″, so there may be some deviation if too few (or too many) worthy groups are found. If you’re a robotic engineer with a proven history of research in the field, you can learn more by reading WG’s proposal form.
[Photo credits: Willow Garage]
Tags: open source, PR2, PR2 Beta, robot operating system, robotics, ROS, silicon valley, Willow Garage
PUBLIC DOMAIN: Health, Entertainment, Academia - HEA
Everything pertaining to the public should be public domain, yes
everything, especially HEA.
Do not "believe" in
virtual "property" or you will lose real property & life in
the exchange.
We are seeing a great
change, a looming Battle Royale between:
Best,
DAVID ALANDETE - Washington - 22/01/2010
El Gobierno de Estados Unidos presionó ayer a las empresas norteamericanas que operan en China para que dejen de doblegarse ante los duros requisitos de censura en Internet que impone Pekín. En un duro discurso, la secretaria de Estado, Hillary Clinton, les exigió que "tomen un papel activo y desafíen las exigencias de censura de gobiernos extranjeros".
El Gobierno de Estados Unidos presionó ayer a las empresas norteamericanas que operan en China para que dejen de doblegarse ante los duros requisitos de censura en Internet que impone Pekín. En un duro discurso, la secretaria de Estado, Hillary Clinton, les exigió que "tomen un papel activo y desafíen las exigencias de censura de gobiernos extranjeros". "El sector privado tiene una responsabilidad compartida a la hora de ayudar a salvaguardar la libertad de expresión", añadió.
La secretaria de Estado defendió ayer a Google tras el ataque sufrido en diciembre, en el que unos espías informáticos chinos robaron información de sus servidores y penetraron en las cuentas de disidentes y activistas políticos radicados en EE UU. Exigió a China que "acometa una investigación exhaustiva sobre las ciberintrusiones que llevaron a Google a revelar el ataque" y que las pesquisas sean transparentes.
A raíz de aquel ataque, que afectó a otras 33 firmas norteamericanas, Google decidió dejar de censurar los resultados de su buscador en chino, unas restricciones que estaban en pie desde 2006, y amenazó con abandonar aquel país. Las demás informáticas norteamericanas que operan en China o han preferido mantener silencio al respecto o, en el caso de Microsoft, han anunciado que seguirán censurándose y acatando las exigencias de Pekín para poder hacer negocios allí.
Clinton, sin nombrar directamente a Microsoft, Yahoo o America Online, les exigió un cambio de rumbo inmediato. "La censura no debería ser algo aceptable para ninguna empresa en ningún lugar", dijo. "En EE UU, las compañías deben ser más críticas". Y a pesar de la cautela habitual del Gobierno estadounidense a la hora de interferir en decisiones empresariales, la secretaria de Estado exigió a esas firmas que "cuando sus negocios puedan contribuir a mermar la libertad, decidan qué es lo correcto y qué es un simple beneficio a corto plazo".
En China, todas esas empresas filtran los resultados de sus buscadores, para censurar información sobre asuntos políticamente incómodos, como el Dalai Lama, los incidentes en Tiananmen o el movimiento Falun Gong. Clinton advirtió que las compañías se pueden resentir, incluso fuera de China, por esa decisión: "No importa dónde vivan, los consumidores quieren creer que lo que publican en Internet no se usará jamás en contra de nadie".
En un día en que Clinton convirtió el problema de Google y los hackers en un asunto político de primera magnitud, después de haber anunciado el envío de una nota de protesta diplomática a Pekín, el Gobierno chino intentó dejar el asunto en una simple incidencia empresarial. "Si Google tiene algún problema con sus negocios en China, se deben resolver de acuerdo con las leyes chinas, y el Gobierno de China está dispuesto a ayudar en la resolución de esos problemas", dijo ayer el viceministro de Asuntos Exteriores chino, He Yafei, informa Reuters.
"El caso de Google no se debería asociar a las relaciones entre dos gobiernos y dos países. [...] Se trataría de una exageración", añadió. Según esos parámetros, Clinton hubiera exagerado al nombrar ayer a China en repetidas ocasiones y al opinar que la censura en la Red por parte de países como Irán o Corea del Norte está creando "un telón de acero" en Internet.
Información de diversas firmas de seguridad relaciona el ataque de diciembre con direcciones de conexión a la Red usadas en el pasado por hackers asociados al Gobierno chino o por agencias que dependen de él, alimentando las sospechas de que el ataque podría tener motivaciones políticas y que podría haber sido ejecutado con el beneplácito de Pekín, algo que desde China ha sido desmentido categóricamente.
Hasta la fecha, la Administración de Barack Obama ha utilizado un tono conciliador con China, por ser un interlocutor imprescindible para llegar a un acuerdo sólido en materia de cambio climático y para tratar con la dictadura norcoreana. Aún así, durante su visita oficial a Pekín, en noviembre, el presidente estadounidense pidió más libertad de expresión para los internautas chinos.
Microsoft is working to patch the
vulnerability through a software update
|
Microsoft has admitted that its Internet Explorer was a weak link in the recent attacks on Google's systems that originated in China.
The firm said in a blog post on Thursday that a vulnerability in the browser could allow hackers to remotely run programs on infected machines."Based upon our investigations, we have determined that Internet Explorer was one of the vectors used in targeted and sophisticated attacks against Google and possibly other corporate networks," said Microsoft's director of security response Mike Reavey in the post.
'Unfortunate'
Security firm McAfee told news agency AFP that the attacks on
Google, which targeted Chinese human rights activists worldwide,
showed a level of sophistication above that of typical, isolated
cyber criminal efforts.
McAfee's vice-president of threat research Dmitri Alperovitch
told AFP that although the firm had "no proof that the Chinese
are behind this particular attack, I think there are indications
though that a nation-state is behind it".
The recent spate of attacks was alleged to have hit more than 30 companies including Google and Adobe, but security firms have since said that such invasions are routine.
Mr Reavey echoed this in the post.
"Unfortunately cyber crime and cyber attacks are daily occurrences in the online world. Obviously, it is unfortunate that our product is being used in the pursuit of criminal activity. We will continue to work with Google, industry leaders and the appropriate authorities to investigate this situation."
ABSENCE of PROOF is NOT PROOF of ABSENCE
Real money is the
fairest, fastest, best way
to build The Robotic Wageless Economy©
Real
vs. Fake
People, Progress, Money
If
you are like me, you want real answers
and real solutions to
challenges, lasting solutions, that
with today's technology are
more than possible, they are just
begging to deliver their goods
to real people in reality, not some
far off promise like some
"FREE
Pizza Tomorrow" sign in
a window: Always True?,
Yet never Delivered !!! or in the case
of Paper Money: "Promise
to Pay Bearer on Demand", when with
Real Money, i.e. Gold Coin,
you are already PAID the moment you
have it in hand !!!
With the proper technology roll
out via patient, sober leadership,
never mind whether you, your neighbor,
or the CEO of Walmart
understands it yet, for that day may
never come at the same time
for everyone, we can solve every
challenge facing us with the proper
technique & knowledge, i.e.
Technology: then there will be
plenty of "time" later for everyone to
"understand" it, point is, at
least you will be here to have the
potential to understand it.
Now a whirlwind discussion of some of
our biggest challenges facing
us, which can each be solved in the
blink of an eye, if enough
people understand fast enough,
everyone else can be filled in later
as their curiosity leads them.
Abuse of
Seignorage {definition:
Privilege of Nations to Print
Money and Flags of convenience
etc.}
PAPER MONEY's ROLE in
Delaying REAL Progress
The whole notion of paper money is
problematic, multinational or otherwise.
When money has intrinsic value, i.e. it does not just simply represent value, but is itself valuable, it goes without saying that the holders of such real money cannot have it devalued nearly as easily as those holding even the best paper money paper money can buy !!!
That being said, need we say anymore ?
There should not be different "brands" of paper money, national or otherwise, they are all tainted, manipulable, but not gold, gold is gold is gold, no matter whose face is emblazoned on the coin!
Not only should there not be different national currencies, there should not be paper currency of any kind, only gold coins of regulated weight and composition. [other precious metals are fine too, think intrinsic value, requires no trust] As for notes fixed to gold, the temptation is too great to keep the ratios fixed, they have never remained fixed, always slipped, always.
With gold, trust in no person is required after a transaction using gold as the medium of exchange has been made, the gold's value will fluctuate only based on the availability of gold itself, not the whims of those with ability to print up willy nilly oodles of more paper currency.
People who inanely argue that if there is not enough gold, economic activity will slow to a halt are just plain silly, perhaps even disingenuous, and they know it: the value of whatever gold there is available will simply rise, which is a good thing, not bad, free market will still function, and best of all, no one's savings, if in gold, will be devalued. That a Gold Standard was the cause of economic trouble in the past is one of the biggest lies of all time, and only served to remove gold from the hands of the pliant common folk, a gargantuan theft which continues unabated.
People need a reason to save, be frugal, efficient and sober in all dealings, and money that cannot easily lose its value due simply to the whim of coordinated action by some humans is crucial to that end. As real as your money is, is as real as you are some feel.
Unless you have this correct premise, one can spin any kind of complex story one wants, attempting to overflow the buffers of one's readers to the point they forget the premise and agree with your points out of sheer exhaustion somewhere in the middle, via endless comparisons of permutations of the same faulty premises re: the numerous paper currencies' relationships with each other, all rubbish, figuratively and actually !
Unless you can hold a continuous logically connected series of thoughts from beginning to end, you can be convinced of anything, including that paper money is anything but a crude parlor trick.
Paper money is almost as bad as electronic money. A regression of virtual money. All theft is based on fraud. Paper money is a lie and requires trust that just does not exist. It says I am worth more than the paper I am printed on. Cashless is even more dependent on trust, whereas Gold is Gold, and is itself worth something as a material of remarkable usefulness.
Electronic money is even worse than paper money: there is no way to know how much there really is out there, almost like paper money, both of which can be created out of thin air, unlike gold, but with the Electronic money's added danger of it not being possible to make a run on a bank if there is nothing physical to demand, i.e. not even paper money !!!
Then the only way to restore equilibrium after the type of fraud possible in a cashless society is usually war, since things can become so out of whack when even the run on banks mechanism is gone, an implicit result of cashless. And lots of unhappy ripped off people are better done away with then dealt with as the tragic rationalization goes, and has often been the solution historically, aka wars to reduce the population, all other excuses as cover for this simple fact.
Now contrast cashless with wageless, and you will really begin to see that all forms of money, even gold, are really only a way to organize matter beneath those creating the particular monetary system in question, i.e. those first issuing "money" in whatever form, and that a wageless economy where all work is performed by robots and computers is where we are headed, and that what we have today is a form of it, but a brutal form where real breathing people are turned into robots by the issuers of paper money !!!, when real robots would be so much more, shall we say, humane and sensible to use than real humans as robots !!!
Forex Not Possible with Real Money
The whole notion of 4X itself is flawed because it is a leak in the system, where differences are exploited, and only those with reach across multiple regions can reasonably exploit such differences. One can argue that all such exploitation eventually brings progressive equilibrium, but in so saying you have admitted that exploitation is part of that "progress".
Besides, those addicted to such easy money, will and have always endeavored to maintain the differences intentionally via pseudo-representative "governance" commandeered by extra-governmental international mechanism keeping exploitable differences in place, milking the differential, just as one does with Ocean Thermal Energy, Geothermal Energy, the Hegelian Dialectic, thereby remaining in the above the fray position from which to cherry pick indefinitely. Why should this situation EVER change unless we provide a better way ?
Before we had
the robotic technology we now possess, many of
these arguments and "peculiar ways of doing
things" may have made some sense in that there was
no better way to achieve "progress", but with the
level of progress thus far achieved, ironically in
large part via exploitation, it is now possible to
exploit only
inanimate matter, i.e. robots and computers made
from inanimate matter and possessing no will of
their own, as hard as it is for those accustomed
to exploiting humans to admit this, it is
nevertheless true that all such exploitation of
contrived differences enforced on humans is now no longer
"necessary", and the big concern now is
how will those who took the status quo to be
ordained, how will they now behave knowing there
is a better way, and will they help lead the
transition to "The Robotic Wageless Economy©
More on the interesting concept of a wageless robotic economy that we are hearing more and more about, can be found here: http://RoboEco.com/CFR
In
summary, "The Robotic Wageless Economy©
If you feel you can help write this piece more clearly, or would like to help out in other ways or simply wish to share your thoughts:
Please write us: sysop@TeamInfinity.com
Thanks, Be well.
Cheers !!!
{ What you just read was in response to what you are about to read from the CFR, only the link is included, so please follow the link to read the honorable Benn Steil's most excellent piece which in part inspired the above response to it which you just read: }
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/
==========================
If you could spend the rest of your life, with no end in sight, doing whatever you wanted to do, being whatever you wanted to be, for as long as you want and with as much variety as you like, how would you conduct yourself, how would it vary from what you are doing right now, and why aren't you living that way now, if you aren't, and if you are, what do you see as the best way to continue, and how would you like the world to change to support or enhance your ability to do so without restricting anyone else's ability to do the same ? How could crime even exist ?
"Hey, wait a minute, what's the big idea, what are we toiling
away for when there are robots that can do all this mundane
work, and we could be free like the elites, and yes we would
know what to meaningfully do with our free time, if we had
some, thank you very much" ?
The door is opening to an age of supercomputers to
help organize our complicated society and modified
ecology; superconductors to minimize energy waste; and
robots to perform work not fit for humans, thereby
increasing our leisure time and life spans.
