Frequently Asked Questions


http://TeamInfinity.com/COMMUNICAE-Design-vs-Assemble.shtml


Look, it is certain you may be fully occupied by all the crazy news meant to distract & "entertain" allowing the manipulators
and their sympathizers and cynics to move ahead of you while you thrash about back and forth between left and right as a true believer
in remnants of the current fading system, but you really need to focus on and share the solution instead, here it is:


Design vs. Assemble



For context, first closely watch this very important high speed robot hand video showing we are already there in terms of technical feasibility: http://teaminfinity.com/COMMUNICAE-12552.shtml

Now all we need to do is propagate robotics through every industry to free us all from ALL jobs, just like the excellent example set by the elite, to force the creation of the new economic model that uses real robots instead of human robots to carry on our migration into the solar system, and for those of you who say we have too many problems to fix here, all the more reason to do this, for it will lift us out of these otherwise intractable ancient repeating problems, that is the problem, i.e. staying in the muck too long.  Look up.


Assertion:  Those who fear properly designed robots are delusional, perhaps subconsciously considering themselves robots in competition with other robots, which in many ways they already are but of the human kind, or they would not fear real robots, for why would you fear a servant designed to serve you, designed by your own kind, with full knowledge of  the clear differences and relationships between servant and served explicitly included in said design ?  You want this to happen.

To even have to explain this is just another sign of how much education and change of process is required to deprogram the robotic human population.

Therefore let it be discussed amongst ourselves:

Definition: Properly Designed Robot

A. Robots, human or real, shall not Design Robots under any circumstance
B. Robots,  may only assemble Robots, not design them, never
C. Robots must never be designed to "think on their own", not even approximately, there is no sane reason to do this {see C2}
D. Only Human Humans may Design Robots, for they understand the difference and are not confused, and will keep them from mixing

Corollaries:
  • A1: Just as cows must not eat cow, nor humans human, robots, of any kind, shall not design Robots
  • B1: No mixing of modes, as long as robots remain servants, and only think predefined servant "thoughts", real human humans are safe.
  • B2: Greatest threat is from confused humans who even partially consider themselves robots: some wanting to use other robots to subjugate other humans, for they cannot understand what it really means to be real human human, where subjugation is never desired and looked upon as weak & foolish.
    • Included in this group of confused humans perhaps are those wanting to create "Evil A/I", or  robots  that think on their own,  or military robots, it is like the fool who pulls on a string attached to a huge boulder above his head with a label that says "do not pull this string", or do not eat this apple, etc. 
    • With robots doing all the work, there is no reason for humans to fight with each other over who does all the work, and therefore no need for military, let alone military robots, silly fools...  Somebody could lose an eye, no joke.
    • re: "Evil A/I", the only practical use this can have is if it is used to anticipate or foil "evil" in others, but having said that presumes that "nothing can exist", any more than zero or time exist outside of being incredibly useful, yet misunderstood by most, concepts, when evil is defined as the lack of something which it always can be, i.e. the lack of compassion, or lack of food etc.  But why even invest so much negative energy is my question to you ?
    • So again, as long as "mistakes" are kept purely virtual, and are not allowed to enter into the physical real realm, we are fine, because "make-believe" itself is fine and as long as it is used only to improve reality. 
  • C1: The boundaries encapsulating all  permutations and combinations of all predefined Robot "thought" and range of motion must be explicitly defined with hard limits a priori.
    • For this reason, and their Eugenics past partnership with IBM,  Microsoft could  be barred from Robotics until they clean up their act because of their sloppy, perhaps intentional obfuscation of their computer operating systems leading to so called "insecurity" , uncertainty, and plausible deniability.  We must have enforceable non-repudiation of design and full transparency.

  • C2: What is meant by "Thinking on their own" is not clearly understood by many and practiced even less by most humans, yet in fact is precisely what defines a human in their ability to do so.  Following instructions explicitly defined and limited within a subset of the full range of physically possible actions is NOT  "thinking or acting on your own". 
    • As such, robots can be permitted  to do anything including,  heuristics and AI, within the "not thinking on your own" rubric defined above which explicitly circumscribes the physical range of action in no uncertain universally acknowledged terms as defined by physics, within which any possibility is permitted, and since the physical realm has been thus circumscribed and as Robots do not possess spirits like human humans do, all areas of concern are addressed there being only the physical and spiritual realms to address.
    • So with this definition acknowledged by designers, we will have no problems. All the more reason humans really need to understand the obvious lines of demarcation between themselves as true humans and their robotic designs:  there are no dilemmas, only the confused see and propagate dilemmas due to lack of understanding and fear, and therefore we must make sure they only assemble or just enjoy leisure until they do understand clearly how simple these distinctions are.
    • Remember we are building all this so we can ALL be at leisure whenever we like, not an endless set of moving targets set before you by those trying to keep you as their robot and preventing you from becoming the human being you started out as by preventing the realization of real robotics because of how easy it is to robotize and replace human robots, lets make robotics NECESSARY, by not being so easily robotized ourselves, hello ????                                                                   Is there anybody out there ?  Hello ?

Your Comments Kindly Requested...

Robots needn't look like humans...

In fact, we are really talking about systems of computers interfacing with physical reality via actuators of any imaginable assortment, all to serve us non-robots, that we human BEINGS may do what we were born to be, friends with each other, learning and teaching, socializing, exercising, taking care of ourselves and each other, all on a 100% freewill basis as WE-R©  meant to be...
Thanks to a great friend for providing this excellent link as example of how robots needn't look like humans, and it must be emphasized, they mustn't, that way we know who is who always, because today most humans sadly consider themselves mere machines, which is a great fallacy, for it belies the fact we are indeed ALL sacred children of the most high extremely generous Creator of Existence itself. 

That is who WE-R©, and not the human robots abused for eons to serve the faux-elite, nor R-WE© the real robots that will serve us once we roll-out WE-R© Always remember the true-noble-elite are determined to save all, hence their being known as the true & noble.  As for the faux-elite, wish them well too, knowing that WE-R© going to save them too, the willing that is, because this is a free-will based system and we mustn't force anyone to do or be anything against their will.

Read more here regarding the proper big picture robotic system design perspective/architecture necessary to insure the extant, creeping, ginormous pervasive, nascent, barely noticed by too few, emergent "robot" called the cap/com/soc "economy", which humans now serve, must be transitioned to instead serve humans as WE-R©, before this rogue robot,  in its current maniacal form inhales us whole, let us not forget the original purpose of technology & government, to serve us, not eat us !!, point being we cannot avoid this, we must address it if we plan to continue as our destiny of populating the universe mandates us to :
Also, please check out this from HONDA contributed by another great friend, which while perfect for handicapped people, is also ideal as the drive mechanism of a robot, yet not for humans to atrophy further as depicted in the video, robots are meant to serve us, not make us lazy, this is very important, we must still exercise and take care of ourselves, and fortunately we will have vastly increased opportunity to do so and be, so much more than is the case today: 
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=cuIJRsAuCHQ
  • http://dreams.honda.com/videos/living-with-robots/    
  • NOTE: we do not necessarily endorse HONDA's perspective in all cases, we simply wish to acknowledge their progress & contributions and share their progress with you,  yet wish to clearly emphasize the need to Keep 'em Separated as Offspring said in their song of same title, i.e. aside from assisting the handicapped, we must not mix with robots in any way, they are to serve us, not be us in anyway.

In conclusion, it is vital then that only those that clearly know what it is to be human, to design robots to prevent mixing of metaphors etc.  This is key as further elucidated above.

-





 Surrogates the Movie  commentary below

choose



Be forewarned that some heavy-duty propaganda against Robotics is gearing up, there is a movie called:
  • Surrogates  which hit the silver screen September 25, 2009 starring Bruce Willis.

Be prepared for this onslaught of disinformation where they will propose such imbecilic concepts as Rights for Robots, & Health Care for Robots !!??, to help blur the line for the real purpose of Robots: to serve humans, and never be equal, lets not lose sight of the obvious folks. The other goal of such propaganda is to keep the robotic people believing that is all they are too, just robots...

The idea of surrogates is an interesting one, but to become your surrogate defeats the whole purpose of having one. 

Sure, send several copies of them to work, that makes sense and helps prove the concept of robots being the solution, but DO NOT ATTACH YOURSELF to IT, silly people, geesh, are you all that silly that you need to be told ?

Besides, there is still a middleman, they provide you access to your surrogate, trapping you with your senses like all the other crud today.  Why not live in reality without a proxy ?

See they have even taken the simple concept of a robotic servant and attached you to it via your senses, this is not the idea at all, just another attempt to keep you in their grid...  

You know it is tainted propaganda meant to scare of decent people from the idea of Robotics when they appeal to your basest instincts and subhuman attributes to prevent you from being human. 

Come on you are smarter than that, nevertheless it is a good thing the movie is coming out, because all the real people will understand and help out their challenged confused abused fellow humans to see it correctly...

Here is just another example of the disinformation we speak of from the BBC who otherwise produce acceptable content from time to time:


Recall from previous posts how we made perfectly clear there simply are no REAL dilemmas in REAL reality except for confused people... 

If you disagree, please forward yours to sysop@TeamInfinity.com so we can show you how to resolve it in your own mind.

The offer still stands for you to present your "dilemmas" via email to be deftly, respectfully resolved for you where humanly possible...

Think of these attempts to confuse you by blurring the distinctions between real humans and real robots as merely intelligence tests that these clever connivers like the authors of the BBC article et al, are foisting on the public to see who is real and who is not, i.e. if you think of yourself as a robot, then that is what you are, for you yourself are jealous and feel threatened by and identify with mere machines... 

Who is anyone to argue with you, they slyly surmise as you are decommissioned...

You are a sacred human...  Treat yourself and others like what you really are...  Be well friend...




CLICK for DANGER WILL ROBINSON DYSTOPIAN ROBOTICS ALERT




UPDATED BELOW
.
NEW VIDEOS: http://goo.gl/N4awT

JUST SAY NO to CO-robots
&
YES to Proper DIVINE RoboticTotality©

IS NATIONAL ROBOTIC INITIATIVE ALREADY TAINTED?


DESIGN vs. ASSEMBLE
ARTICLE BELOW MAKES IT CLEAR WHY ONLY

those who fully understand the difference between humans & machines

must lead the way in teaching others the same.

PLEASE FORCE YOUR WISE SELF TO READ THIS IN ITS ENTIRETY

Click to Skip to "Design vs. Assemble"


Click to Skip to:
CHINA to  DEPLOY 1 MILLION REAL ROBOTS......



WE-R© the top down, bottom up big picture master mind plan, that embraces the all so important, always neglected social aspects, i.e. it transitions REAL people from being robots to 100% freedom 100% of the time, via REAL robots being the robots, i.e. to make everyone free while the burden is shifted 100% to the backs of the robotic infrastructure that is full spectrum enough to uplift us ALL, not just particular groups of people.  This requires global governance by the way.  

We must uplift ALL with this global robotic infrastructure...


ALL, since ALL are worthy in that end state, thus we must reverse engineer it into THIS present, NOW.  

Yet the NSF & NRI article authors below just do not seem to understand this, they wish to keep humans as co- robots to real robots !!!

Silly fools...  Of course we make a distinction between working along side, and having a robot help a real person live an infinite, joy filled life.

Yet, fine distinctions are everything and appear to be lost on them: this will not stop them from hiding in the intentionally grey areas of ambiguity lost on most.

REPEAT AFTER ME:
  • I do not want to work along side a robot,
  • I want the robot to do ALL the work !!! 
  • I just want to have fun, how about you ?
  • Slave drivers need to build their own perfect world...
  • or better yet, Why not get REAL ROBOTS to build it ?!
  • Enough with the eternal bait & switch !!!
  • Is this really that difficult to fathom friends ?
  • Think like a master of robots, not a slave.
  • Robots are the perfect Slaves, Humans the worst.
  • Would you want to be a slave ? 
  • Or are you the perfect slave now, thinking you are free ?
  • Expect more, you deserve it, we all deserve the very best possible.
  • Just say NO to CO-robots, and yes to RoboticTotality©
  • No more foot dragging, we know what the end-state looks like, no more half-measures. 
  • No more waiting for fools to co-work themselves to death, its time to tell truth to all. NOW.
  • Lets instead of half-measures,  Get us ALL there safely now.  Work it in reverse.
  • You can see it too, it is so wonderful, that it is literally BEYOND beLIEf  in an infinite universe of splendor.
  • Which can never be overpopulated with joy, bequeathed to us ALL to enjoy FOREVER by the Creator of Existence Itself.
  • So be it !  No more human robots !!!  NWO PART TWO, lets use real robots this time, it is the so much cleaner way to go.
  • That's right, NWO PART ONE was 1776, with HUMAN ROBOTS !!   KNOW IT.  Now Lets make sure NWO PART II uses REAL ROBOTS !!

    • KEY QUESTION:
      • Instead of eternally maneuvering & damaging each other into being each others human robots, why don't we all band together & demand real planetary government provide us ALL a real, full spectrum robotic infrastructure instead, making every life infinitely meaningful and meaningfully infinite.
      • Why don't we indeed ?
      • Are we not all worthy in that end state which is really just the beginning, why of  course we ALL are !!
      • Why do we have leaders if not to lead us all safely to it ?  Be one.

Nevertheless, this desirable,  fully robotic end state will occur, the only question is will you be here when it is ?

With your advocacy for RoboticTotality
© , as we describe below, and the entailed planetary governance to safely transition ALL humans to it, said government exists to serve us all in the first place, & never vice versa, it can be, so reach out to these fools who authored the enclosed NRI article & let them know you want  RoboticTotality©, that nothing else will do.  

  • RoboticTotality© is to serve ALL humans in every way, never the other way around.
  • We exist to serve ourselves and our loved ones, which will soon, as a direct result, include everyone.
  • Robots are for everything else, & will help make this happen, which is a lot if you have not yet noticed.
  • Our "jobs" will be to enjoy our physical, mental, emotional, spiritual and social health, robots will help.

Government is meant to serve all, not just those who have commandeered it, so either get at the design table, or be dominated by your inferiors.


Yet these, with all due respect, fools in the NRI/NSI article you are about to read below, just do not seem to understand this obvious yet subtle distinction, why is it so hard for so called experts, otherwise highly intelligent people to get it ?  They actually propose humans working along side robots !!!  What fools these tools literally are. 

Perhaps these fools want to work along side real robots, as for us and our home, we want REAL robots to do ALL the work, just 'get er done', and spare us the details, we could care less what they do or how they do it, how they "feel" about it, or what it looks like through their "eyes" as they can never have human feelings, they are machines for crying out load, as long as it is 100% safe in every regard, is this really that difficult to grasp ?!!!

Is it because the authors of the NRI/NSI article you are about to read below are in fact human robots, i.e. not really human anymore, just soul-less biological machines ?  See how they propose robots to work along side humans, talk about idiots...  Check out their web page too, email these tools, tell them to snap out of their stupid stupor, before someone has to academically slap them back to sense, silly little posers working for people who just want to stay in control of their human robot farm, people the authors of the article do not even know, yet all would do better, including their masters, once we release ALL knowledge to everyone, no more secrecy,  stop playing stupid slave games, and 3 Card Monty,  so we ALL can really have fun instead !!! 

Aren't you ready too ?


Is this crucial distinction of not desiring to work along side robots that they cannot seem to get, lost on you too ?  

Please tell me you get it.   

Thanks wise one.

Thanks also to a good friend who brings this urgent matter to our attention.



HERE IS the NRI/NSI ARTICLE MENTIONED ABOVE

Click to read it @ their Website & email them directly
Please be respectful, they are merely robots trying to become human.
We need them to understand our perspective, so be nice !!! THX !!

Make sure they realize we are all in this together, and that the sooner
everyone gets it, the sooner we will all be able to enjoy it.

Once everyone sees that the fools @ the top that have assumed
everyone else is their robot, are merely foolish posers, there will be
a 'bum rush' effect, from their distorted, stubbornly self-deceived
pompous point of view, to induce them to become
the good people they can be.

For who is the bum after all squandering our destiny,
forcing all to accept less than we could achieve?
 
The good elite already knows this, and to remain good,
they cannot force anyone to do anything.

That is not the way, that is the way of the bad elite
after-all, forcing others to do things, this situation will be
corrected by REAL robots under our collective command.

Once everyone can have as much of anything they want
the trend will reverse, i.e. too much will be the issue, an
issue far easier to resolve than not enough.  It will self
regulate, and the incentive behind all physical crime will vanish.

Think about it.

See the dilemma you were born, to easily resolve ?

Everyone must freely choose to be real.

reread previous sentence until you get it.

See your life really does have a purpose, and there
is not one more worthy of your sacred existence,
than to extend it into infinity !!

The universe is big enough for all.
Thank G-d !!

http://goo.gl/HpeLr


From: National Science Foundation Update <nsf-update@nsf.gov>Date:September 1, 2011 9:33:02 AM EDT National Robotics Initiative (NRI)Reply-To: National Science Foundation Update <nsf-update@nsf.gov>
Letter of Intent Deadline Date: October 1, 2011 
Small Proposals 

Program Guidelines: NSF 11-553 
The goal of the National Robotics Initiative is to accelerate the development and use of robots in the United States that work beside, or cooperatively with, people. Innovative robotics research and applications emphasizing the realization of such co-robots acting in direct support of and in a symbiotic relationship with human partners is supported by multiple agencies of the federal government including the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space ... 

This is an NSF Upcoming Due Dates item.
This e-mail update was generated automatically based on your subscription to the category listed above. Some updates may belong to more than one category, resulting in duplicate messages.
NSF logo   Subscriber Services: Manage Preferences  |  Unsubscribe  |  Help  |  Contact NSF
  Follow NSF:  Follow us on
                                                YouTube Follow us on
                                                Twitter Follow us on
                                                Facebook Follow us on RSS Follow us on email Science360 News
                                                Service Science Nation
                                                Online Magazine
GovDelivery, Inc. sending on behalf of the National Science Foundation · 4201 Wilson Boulevard · Arlington, VA 22230 · 703-292-5111Powered by
                                                  GovDelivery




Division of Information & Intelligent Systems

National Robotics Initiative  (NRI) 

CONTACTS

Name Email Phone Room
Kishna  S. Ford ksford@nsf.gov (703) 292-4370   
Amy  Friedlander afriedla@nsf.gov (703) 292-2262   
Bruce  M. Kramer bkramer@nsf.gov (703) 292-5348   
Richard  Voyles rvoyles@nsf.gov (703) 292-8950   
Paul  Werbos pwerbos@nsf.gov (703) 292-8339   
Darryl  N. Williams dnwillia@nsf.gov (703) 292-7906   

National Institutes of Health

  • John Haller, Ph.D.
    National Institute of Health
    National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
    Democracy Plaza Two
    6707 Democracy Boulevard
    Bethesda, MD 20892

    Electronic mail: hallerj@mail.nih.gov
    Telephone: 301-594-3009
     

United States Department of Agriculture

  • Daniel Schmoldt, Ph.D.
    National Institute of Food and Agriculture
    Waterfront Centre, Ste. 3440
    800 9th Street SW
    Washington DC 20024

    Electronic mail: dschmoldt@nifa.usda.gov
    Telephone: 202-720-4807
     

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

  • Dr. Robert O. Ambrose

2101 NASA Parkway

Mail Code ER1

NASA Johnson Space Center

 

Electronic mail: robert.o.ambrose@nasa.gov

Telephone: 281-244-5561

 

 

PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Solicitation  11-553

DUE DATES

Letter of Intent Deadline Date:  October 1, 2011

Small Proposals

October 1, Annually Thereafter

Full Proposal Deadline Date:  November 3, 2011

Small Proposals

November 3, Annually Thereafter

Letter of Intent Deadline Date:  December 15, 2011

Group Large Proposals

December 15, Annually Thereafter

Full Proposal Deadline Date:  January 18, 2012

Group Large Proposals

January 18, Annually Thereafter

Public Briefings: One or more collaborative webinar briefings with question and answer functionality will be held beginning in September, 2011 prior to the first submission deadline date. Schedules will be posted on the sponsor announcement web sites.

SYNOPSIS

The goal of the National Robotics Initiative is to accelerate the development and use of robots in the United States that work beside, or cooperatively with, people. Innovative robotics research and applications emphasizing the realization of such co-robots acting in direct support of and in a symbiotic relationship with human partners is supported by multiple agencies of the federal government including the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The purpose of this program is the development of this next generation of robotics, to advance the capability and usability of such systems and artifacts, and to encourage existing and new communities to focus on innovative application areas. It will address the entire life cycle from fundamental research and development to industry  manufacturing and deployment.  Methods for the establishment and infusion of robotics in educational curricula and research to gain a better understanding of the long term social, behavioral and economic implications of co-robots across all areas of human activity are important parts of this initiative.  Collaboration between academic, industry, non-profit and other organizations is strongly encouraged to establish better linkages between fundamental science and technology development, deployment and use.

Two classes of proposals will be considered in response to this solicitation:

  1. Small projects: One or more investigators spanning 1 to 5 years.
  2. Large projects: Multi-disciplinary teams spanning 1 to 5 years.

As detailed in the solicitation, appropriate scientific areas of investigations may be related to any of the participating funding organizations. Questions concerning a particular project's focus, direction and relevance to a participating funding organization should be addressed to the appropriate person in the list of agency contacts found in section VIII of the solicitation.

RELATED URLS

NRI Webinar - 9/13/11 at 11am 

THIS PROGRAM IS PART OF

Additional Funding Opportunities for the IIS Community


What Has Been Funded (Recent Awards Made Through This Program, with Abstracts)

Map of Recent Awards Made Through This Program




Watch these new videos to see that ROBOTS TODAY, the ones 
we
can show you, just imagine those we are not,  are more 
than dexterous enough for any job beneath a human's dignity, 
so that we humans can be what we were meant to be, to be 
free to work only on our own eternal blissful existence, 
enjoying the maintenance our own physical, mental, emotional,
social & spiritual health, 100% FULL TIME vs being each other's
ROBOTS for one moment longer unless it is to accomplish ending all
such non-sense via a Leaderless Wageless Economy - Robotic©
best achieved with only REAL Money until the job is done,
or, it will never be done as fake money only creates fake
human robots, do you get it, so why not...

SPREAD IT !
Just as whichever image of the same single REAL Creator of Existence 
Itself, that all attempt to describe from their respective unnecessarily 
non-universal yet nevertheless sacred perspectives, would have it, despite all 
those who may not yet be able to SEE, TOUCH, FEEL, HEAR, TASTE, KNOW
it as it really is as generous as it is, & always has been !

The truth exists whether or not some are able to appreciate it.

So Help others to get it: that it is THAT good, that it is literally
BEYOND BELIEF, and can only be KNOWN !!!

Thanks to all those who have provided help in getting us here.

Bless Everyone Always with TRUTH

REMEMBER the UNIVERSE is just BIG ENOUGH,
FOR THE REAL SACRED YOU FRIEND
.

Refusal to participate in your government, may insure you will
be ruled by inferiors, that is just how important you are.







DANGER, DANGER WILL ROBINSON !


Good Morning, Greetings & Best Wishes to US ALL

Please do Share this Link with your friends & family

Yogi Berra

As Yogi Berra comically put it:

When you come to a fork in the road, Take it !!

Seriously friends, we do in fact face a true dichotomy today,
a real fork in the road, we indeed are at the crossroads of either...

Scenario A:  Utopian Robotics

Where ALL humanity magnifies its free will via leveraging inanimate
matter in the form of an ubiquitous robotic infrastructure coupled
with an equally pervasive full spectrum Proper Planetary Government.


OR

Scenario B:  Dystopian Robotics

Where humanity is dominated by the same secret cabal dominating us now, with
them hoarding the increased technical leverage meant for all, strictly for themselves.

Using the very same technology that could free us all, to instead tighten the
screws even tighter as the following video makes perfectly clear is possible.


Of course Scenario A is as obviously DIVINE as Scenario B is DEMONIC !
WE-R© indeed here to willingly choose to elevate all to the  DIVINE, always.
Thus our free will choice is as obvious as the 2 scenarios are starkly different.

(Of course, thank G-d there is also a Good Elite , often just as secretive as the faux poser elite, yet
for vastly different reasons.  Some then naively ask, well where is this so called good elite you speak
of, and why do they not simply kill off the "bad" elite, to which the answer is as almost as obvious
as everything else is,  they would no longer be able to call themselves the good elite if they did that,
now would they !?, as good people only ever think good thoughts, which produce good words and result
in good deeds, because they know they will be DIVINELY protected by the good force that many refer
to as G-d, in so being, they are that confident in good for goodness sake you see, & like G-d, expect nothing
in return for so being, this is how strong our confidence in goodness for its own sake
WE-R©
  Are you ?)


Which naturally brings us to...

Obviously just because something is
possible doesn't mean we should do it:

TRUE or TRUE ? 

Please Watch this video which
shows PRECISELY the OPPOSITE 
of what we WANT !! Right, or is it just me ?

Please take a look @ this http://goo.gl/doH7u and see if you can
identify which aspects would be useful to humanity & which would
threaten our very existence if in the "wrong"  hands as it were.

In this article, The Chapter One they
mention, never even happened, yet
they say we are now in Chapter Two !!

Nevertheless, it just goes to show that all technology truly is neutral,
& only becomes a threat when used out of its DIVINE context.
All technology other than perhaps land mines etc we should say.


As Chapter 16 of the Gita so clearly puts it, not everyone is
willing to differentiate between the Divine and the Demonic!!!


Hence the need to fully understand what Robotics has to offer
us in its CORRECT FULL context here: 
http://goo.gl/CQ0sZ




To lighten burden on its human robots...
 

CHINA to DEPLOY 1 MILLION REAL ROBOTS



Obviously this is to be commended, as long as we transition ALL
humans to the safety of a divine life in the here and now, and not
some other place, where many tragically are choosing to go by
their own hand,  due to deplorable "working"  conditions & endless
struggles.


This is what robots are designed for, to create heaven on earth for
REAL HUMANS,
  share the good news, demand a transition to this
heaven on earth from your erstwhile
robo-representatives,  or
become a real human leader to safety yourself.


Of course its possible.
  Why were you even born if not ?

Of course we were all born to be served forever. 

Never the other way around. Accept nothing less.
 

  • I know you are worth it, do you ?

Foxconn to Deploy 1 Million Robots (in China) Over Next 3 Years

July 31, 2011 by Travis Deyle

Frida Humanoid Robot from ABB

News just broke on XinHuaNet (via Slashdot) that Foxconn, a Taiwanese company with more than 1M Chinese laborers on the mainland,  plans to deploy one million robots(!) over the next three years -- a 100-fold increase over current numbers.  This should serve as a wake-up call for the United States.  China already dominates in manufacturing; if they can capture the "new" flexible, light manufacturing space too, then the United States will be in dire straits (National Robotics Initiative or not).  One commenter on HackerNews suggests that the robots will be ABB's Frida. Of course this needs more substantiation, but ABB isn't exactly a newcomer to industrial robotics; the Swiss company has been around for ages.  Still, it would be mildly surprising if ABB wins out over all the competition (eg. Heartland Robotics) that are specifically trying to establish themselves as pioneers in "flexible, light manufacturing."  The future of robotics certainly looks interesting!

Like I mentioned, a commenter on HackerNews suggested that the robot being deployed will be Frida, a humanoid robot made ABB (a Swiss multinational corporation).   Here is Frida:

Frida Humanoid Robot from ABB  Frida Humanoid Robot from ABB

Frida Humanoid Robot from ABB  Frida Humanoid Robot from ABB  Frida Humanoid Robot from ABB

 

I'd like to see a little more substantiation regarding a ABB-Foxconn deal.  One commenter with unsubstantiated claims doesn't make it true; however, ABB and Foxconn have definitely had some interaction in the past.  But an order of 1 million robots would be huge for ABB.  It could easily add several billion dollars in revenues and profit for a company that currently (on the NYSE) has a market cap of around $50B.  Heck, this might make a good speculative stock play if the market doesn't react to this news by Monday (assuming of course that ABB will actually receive the orders).

 

Here is a copy of the press release from XinHuaNet for posterity:

SHENZHEN, July 29 (Xinhua) -- Taiwanese technology giant Foxconn will replace some of its workers with 1 million robots in three years to cut rising labor expenses and improve efficiency, said Terry Gou, founder and chairman of the company, late Friday.

The robots will be used to do simple and routine work such as spraying, welding and assembling which are now mainly conducted by workers, said Gou at a workers' dance party Friday night.

The company currently has 10,000 robots and the number will be increased to 300,000 next year and 1 million in three years, according to Gou.

Foxconn, the world's largest maker of computer components which assembles products for Apple, Sony and Nokia, is in the spotlight after a string of suicides of workers at its massive Chinese plants, which some blamed on tough working conditions.

The company currently employs 1.2 million people, with about 1 million of them based on the Chinese mainland.






This is huge, Please Read all the comments below as they are as informative as the article itself.
So now that the NY Times comes out and speaks on Robots, all you brainwashed 
shoddy human robots will surely pay attention, or at least that is the hope.  Yet they 
threaten you with it, when it is the answer, as long as government does its job which is 
to support it fully, so we all can transition to it, safely, recreationally forever, so be it.
Humans are sacred, only robots are to serve humans, 
never the other way around as is currently the case.
Why even have a government if not to reach this highest of human pinnacles ?  Why indeed.
Yet many of you will take the bait, & become even more vicious human robots in the workplace, 
stupidly working each other to death, wow, it really is going to get bad unless you QUICKLY 
understand there is nothing left for us to do other than put the finishing touches on the one & only
Wageless Economy - Robotic©, that is the only work left to do, yet it must be done
intentionally @
the behest and direction of the concomitant Global Governance and coordination
necessary to
transition us all safely in total comfort.   All the remaining human work must be paid
with 
real money (gold), otherwise real humans will toil forever as shoddy robots when compared
with real ones paradoxically. 
Real Money leads to a Real Robot Economy, Fake Money only sustains
the shoddy Human Robotic Economy.  
Fools are drawn, quartered, divided, conquered, harnessed
worked to death thru their egos.
 Get Smart.
  • Do not compete with real robots nor humans that act like them, 
  • that is why real robots exist, to compete with each other, not us,
  • as we indeed are the beneficiaries of their competition, remember ?
Humans were born to live, let real robots be the Sacrificial Anode in the system to elevate ALL humans.


New York Times

How Did the Robot End Up With My Job?

By 
Published: October 1, 2011

I’VE done a lot of television book interviews lately, and I continue to be struck at what a difference there is in the technology in just a few years’ time.

Josh Haner/The New York Times

Thomas L. Friedman


Readers shared their thoughts on this article.

Here is a typical evening at a major cable TV network: arrive at Washington studio and be asked to sign in by a contract security guard. Be met by either a young employee who appears to still be in college or an older person who seems to have hung on with tenure. Have your nose powdered by that person. Have your microphone attached by that person. Be positioned in the studio chair by that person, and then look directly into a robotic camera being manipulated by someone in a control room in New York and speak to whoever the host is wherever he or she is. That’s it: one employee, a robot and you.  

Think of how many jobs — makeup artist, receptionist, camera person, producer-director — have been collapsed into one. I raise this point because there is no doubt that the main reason for our 9.1 percent unemployment rate is the steep drop in aggregate demand in the Great Recession. But it is not the only reason. “The Great Recession” is also coinciding with — and driving — “The Great Inflection.”

In the last decade, we have gone from a connected world (thanks to the end of the cold war, globalization and the Internet) to a hyperconnected world (thanks to those same forces expanding even faster). And it matters. The connected world was a challenge to blue-collar workers in the industrialized West. They had to compete with a bigger pool of cheap labor. The hyperconnected world is now a challenge to white-collar workers. They have to compete with a bigger pool of cheap geniuses — some of whom are people and some are now robots, microchips and software-guided machines.

I wrote about the connected world in 2004, arguing that the world had gotten “flat.” When I made that argument, though, Facebook barely existed — and Twitter, cloud computing, iPhones, LinkedIn, iPads, the “applications” industry and Skype had either not been invented or were in their infancy. Now they are exploding, taking us from connected to hyperconnected. It is a huge inflection point masked by the Great Recession.

It is also both a huge challenge and opportunity. It has never been harder to find a job and never been easier — for those prepared for this world — to invent a job or find a customer. Anyone with the spark of an idea can start a company overnight, using a credit card, while accessing brains, brawn and customers anywhere. It is why Pascal Lamy, chief of the World Trade Organization, argues that terms like “made in America” or “made in China” are phasing out. The proper term, says Lamy, is “made in the world.” More products are designed everywhere, made everywhere and sold everywhere.

The term “outsourcing” is also out of date. There is no more “out” anymore. Firms can and will seek the best leaders and talent to achieve their goals anywhere in the world. Dov Seidman, is the C.E.O. of LRN, a firm that helps businesses develop principled corporate cultures, and the author of “How: Why How We Do Anything Means Everything.” He describes the mind-set of many C.E.O.’s he works with: “I run a global company with a global mission and one set of shared values in pursuit of global objectives. My employees are all over the world — more than half outside the U.S. — and more than half of my revenues and my plans for growth are out there, too. So you tell me: What is out and what is in anymore?”

Matt Barrie, is the founder of freelancer.com, which today lists 2.8 million freelancers offering every service you can imagine. “The whole world is connecting up now at an incredibly rapid pace,” says Barrie, and many of these people are coming to freelancer.com to offer their talents. Barrie says he describes this rising global army of freelancers the way he describes his own team: “They all have Ph.D.’s. They are poor, hungry and driven: P.H.D.”

Barrie offered me a few examples on his site right now: Someone is looking for a designer to design “a fully functioning dune buggy.” Forty people are now bidding on the job at an average price of $268. Someone is looking for an architect to design “a car-washing cafe.” Thirty-seven people are bidding on that job at an average price of $168. Someone is looking to produce “six formulations of chewing gum” suitable for the Australian market. Two people are bidding at an average price of $375. When Barrie needed a five-word speech to accept a Webby Award, he offered $1,000 for the best idea. He got 2,730 entries and accepted “The Tech Boom Is Back.” Someone looking for “a rap song to help Chinese students learn English” has three bids averaging $157.

Indeed, there is no “in” or “out” anymore. In the hyperconnected world, there is only “good” “better” and “best,” and managers and entrepreneurs everywhere now have greater access than ever to the better and best people, robots and software everywhere. Obviously, this makes it more vital than ever that we have schools elevating and inspiring more of our young people into that better and best category, because even good might not cut it anymore and average is definitely over.



READERS' COMMENTS

How Did the Robot End Up With My Job?Back to Article »

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Today’s hyperconnected world requires white-collar workers to compete with a bigger pool of cheap geniuses, some of whom are robots, microchips and software-guided machines.

Comments are no longer being accepted.




1.
james
memphis
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
Poor, hungry and driven. Sounds more like the 18th century than what I had hoped for the 21st; maybe we are indeed heading back to the future. International Finance has destroyed 200 years of gains in the Western World by working people. The WTO is obsessed with open borders and free trade, but actively works to destroy minimum wages, safety rules, overtime pay, reasonable work days, pollution and environmental rules; it only attempts to protect the wealth of the investors. This open world you so strongly support means that Western industry has to compete with totalitarian regimes which routinely imprison anyone who questions their authority. No labor unions. No regulations. No democracy. This is lunacy.

How can free societies survive in an unfair trade war where international finance continues this race to the bottom? Are we to give up on everything won with generations of struggle? It will be easy to compete with China once we get rid of the EPA and allow factories to spew waste into our air and water again. Get rid of unions, wage and hour rules, no more OSHA, no child labor laws, no property protections, no insurance. Then we can once again compete. The world will be flat.

Or maybe we can move to restrict free trade to free countries. Perhaps we could impose tariffs on goods produced by countries with no protections for labor or environment. We could move to reward production instead of finance. And we could once again try to rebuild a society where working class people are respected and have a chance of living a fair and productive life.
 Recommend Recommended by 333 Readers
2.
poomakmak
tent
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
"Anyone with the spark of an idea can start a company overnight, using a credit card, while accessing brains, brawn and customers anywhere." I have no idea how you can say such a thing. Further, the 'bids' for work you cite as positive instances are mostly desperate people trying to get any income they can. The educational divide in this society divides even the dividers: the difference between IP attorneys and those working for impoverished inner-city folks accused of stealing a slice of pizza.
 Recommend Recommended by 122 Readers
3.
Gerard
Dallas
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
Are you telling us that the prices posted for work on Freelancer.com represent some kind of progress? Look closer. Write a 500-word piece for a dollar?!? You could starve to death working for those prices.And large numbers of the people posting these jobs are barely literate themselves, as witness their own writing. If that's the future. . .
 Recommend Recommended by 210 Readers
4.
Alan
Washington, DC
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
In the not too distant future, robots will be able to do most jobs, so labor costs will not be very important. Smart robots will permit an increase in productivity that will dwarf even the increase during the industrial revolution. The challenge will be distributing the wealth the robots can create. The ultimate irony is that in the future, the more heavily "the rich" are taxed, the richer they will become. If the wealth is confined to a relatively small number of executives and the few employees they need to run the robots, demand will plummet, the economy will stagnate, and the income of "the rich" will decrease, while if the income is heavily taxed and the wealth is redistributed by the government, demand will increase, the economy will grow, and the income of "the rich" will increase: sort of the Laffer effect in reverse. But good luck getting the needed policies through a Republican congress!
 Recommend Recommended by 87 Readers
5.
Mark
Colorado
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
Today's column is (I sincerely hope) a wake-up call for young people seeking employment. Hopefully they are reading your column and understanding the implications for their future life. If they do not understand or heed your very clear message, what will become of them, and any offspring they generate? I am 70 and retired with Wyoming Retirement, Social Security, some family farm income, plus the wife's social and retirement. We can pay our bills IF we DO NOT buy a second home, a new car (like $22,000.) or take more than one trip a year to see family in the UK, France, Spain, or Germany. My question is: Where are people who do not understand "DO NOT" going to end up? Scary!!
 Recommend Recommended by 22 Readers
6.
home
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
Along with what and where is labor in the connected world today. What and were is value? And what and where is the business infrastructure? How many businesses today exist only on the hard drives of servers and their connected network. There may be leased spaces but no leased property whose property title is registered in the county court house of any county within the united states or any country in the world. And what can be said of what businesses and value anymore when we ordered some books for our kids for Christmas and the book cost a dollar and shipping cost 5 dollars. More economic businesses was involved in the shipping the book than the market value of the book. And today what is a book any way when one can buy a Kindle or pay for downloading an ebook onto a computer. Yes the books royalties have to be paid, but what happened to all of the jobs created by printing, storing, transporting, designing, and marketing the hard cover and soft cover versions. The book has been scanned onto a server where it is available to be purchased by all. Most of the real jobs end up being the ones needed to support and police the internet and create and modify the software to do this. Again who and where are these ghostly businesses. Are they sitting at home alone in a bathrobe or down at the beach. And if this is so where are all of the company buildings and warehouses and if these all stand empty because most of the real work can be done by dispersed groups working in the privacy of their own spaces. What happens to all of the construction jobs when business buildings and warehouses are not need or are just for show? Yes there is a lot left for factories and manufacturers and all of the jobs created by them. But today many of the social service jobs and insurance jobs and God knows what else is being done from the individuals private space who knows were. The radiologist read my kids cat scan from across the ocean in Spain.
 Recommend Recommended by 29 Readers
7.
South Carolina
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
A couple of types of white collar worker exist. Those you described all fit in the engineering or designer category. After reading your piece, my first question was, "How many of these $200 solutions actually worked and made it to market?" Also, just what level of expertise are these people bringing to the projects? 

The projects you listed were somewhat trivial. Otherwise, what a boon for the cost of medicine! For example, how about a cure for leukemia? Is someone going to assemble a $100 million laboratory and sell the formulation for $375? 

A more critical shortage is effective leadership with working solutions. We need to drop unemployment in the U.S. by four percentage points within the next year and raise the middle class income by 5% during that period. What will that design cost? $300? I like the idea of designing social solutions that work. The obstacle is getting them implemented. 

During my university years I was often up until 1:30 AM making sure I understood my calculus homework and was not just solving problems. I was often up that late making sure I understood computer programming algorithms and was not just going through the motions. A family joke was if I showed up at holiday, my companion would be my physics textbook during the semesters I was taking my engineering physics courses. I wanted to be a useful engineer. Guess it worked. I'm still employed. 

Had anyone told me my degree in electronics engineering would qualify me to endlessly bid on $200 contracts, I'd have studied something else as would have my classmates. However, a nation without an abundance of engineers is a nation bereft of independence. 

What you presented has its place. It also highlights need for the U.S. to more rapidly implement truly high speed Internet such as Japan uses. Already, nations with the fastest access to, and fastest capability to process our vast store of knowledge, combined with shared human imagination, produce the most sought-after products.
 Recommend Recommended by 99 Readers
8.
New Jersey
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
Good piece. Your "inflection point" took its own time showing up (many of us having been expecting it now for many years); showed up at a bad time generally; and indeed has been obscured by other events in a teetering economy. But it's here, and we'd better get with the program. 

But this is an opportunity for passé liberals to re-invent themselves, as well as a government that pretty soon is going to be completely run by non-liberals. You see, the reason the robot ended up with all the jobs that aren't (temporarily) owned by off-shore workers, is that the robot tends to do one thing very well and very cheaply; while the American worker who does only one thing often doesn't do it very well and is anything but cheap. If all you need done is that one thing, then which are you going to choose? 

But it doesn't have to end that way, and this is where re-invented liberals come in. It's clear that, perforce, deficits are going down because conservatives are going to slash budgets across the board, and this won't simply be limited to entitlements, it will need to include the military, as well. This will free up enormous sums of money, both real money and the debt that otherwise would accrete without the cuts. Liberals should be cooperating, but seeking as quid pro quo a set-aside to fund a new Agency for American Competitiveness (get rid of 100, or dramatically de-fund them; but add this one). 

The purpose would be to identify the actual jobs that are needed today and likely to be needed in five years (yes, I know we have study groups that project this, but they're at best anemic, completely unable to affect our reality); then, identify the skills required to do those jobs, which would need to consist not of one thing but multiple, related things that have value. The American worker who does numerous, related things well is far, far less susceptible to being replaced by Robbie the Robot; and is far more valuable to anyone who employs him, making his non-cheap status wearable. 

Then, incentivize community colleges with federal subsidies throughout the U.S. to offer programs that train workers in the skills required to do the jobs. Provide scholarships to workers/students for continued study who demonstrate high performance in the early parts of the studies. Provide two-year tax breaks to companies that hire the graduates and keep them for not less than two years. 

In order for us to re-invent our middle class (and save it), we need to put our workers beyond easy replacement by single-purpose hardware and software. Outsourced workers labor within inflexible, tightly controlled machines of their own kind; so we need our workers to be flexible, able to adapt quickly to new needs where outsourcing engines require time to adapt by adjusting rigid processes and re-training their people. 

Seeing a robot or an off-shore worker take your job doesn't need to be the end of the story. If it's done right, it can be the beginning of a much better, more sustainable one.
 Recommend Recommended by 9 Readers
9.
Macro
Atlanta, GA
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
This is a great thing Friedman. No more we are rich here and help the poor out there. Equal opportunity now. Of course it will not be perfect, of course there will be challenges, but for the average person the world will be a better place. Asimov would have loved it!
 Recommend Recommended by 4 Readers
Atlanta, GA
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
Tom, this would be more inspiring and make more sense if your 'best' people weren't giving away their creative skills for $375. 

The frightening implication here is that creativity and design have basically become worthless.
 Recommend Recommended by 158 Readers
home
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
One more question, When I am in my internet world and typing in photons and electrons, where and really when does that world reside and when the businesses that occupy that world go bankrupt how to they auction off the assets. What labor force maintains this reality and where is the infrastructure and if one makes a capital investment what exactly is one investing in. What does stock in the company really mean that you have part ownership in exactly what? Are we investing in nouns when we invest in the internet or are we investing in processes and verbs. Is all there really is a bunch of binary numbers its there or it isn't code which creates images on a screen. If I own stock what pixels do I own and how do I get them. Is a large part of businesses today investment in kinetic or potential energy so that when the businesses goes bankrupt its vanishes like the spark on a magicians wand.
 Recommend Recommended by 8 Readers
Econfix
SFO
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
$268 for a dune buggy design; $168 for a car-washing café architecture; $375 for a product formulation. Mr. Friedman, doesn’t this seem like a crime to you? In candor, why get an education at all, if you can only make a few dollars per hour as a freelancer? You would be better off washing dishes. You may earn enough to eat - maybe. We have a serious problem as a country, if this is the best an educated person can do.
 Recommend Recommended by 195 Readers
Pennsylvania
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
Saving and creating jobs for U.S. workers is a high priority in these trying times. A self-regulating scheme for doing that was suggested several years ago by Warren Buffett. It continues to be overlooked. It consists of the following:

U.S. exporters would be granted $ import credits based on $ amounts that they collect from foreign customers. Would-be importers would be required to purchase such $ import credits on a regulated exchange before releasing $ funds to pay for imports. Imports/exporters includes services as well as goods.

In periods of import imbalance, such as have now, those import credits would rise in price as would-be importers competed to buy them.

Exporters would thus receive windfall profits encouraging them to expand production for export. That would help to expand employment. Would-be importers, on the other hand, would have an incentive to look for domestic suppliers in order to avoid this extra expense of importing. That also should have a positive effect on U.S. employment.
 Recommend Recommended by 35 Readers
Roman
Seneca, SC
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
It seems like the inevitable conclusion is that the less educated, less motivated are compressed further down. Not everyone can be better or best.
 Recommend Recommended by 32 Readers
Diane
Chicago
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
I'm about to scream the next time some middle-aged humanities major talks about Facebook as if it's the greatest thing in mankind and can be used to feed and shelter 7 billion people on this planet. Facebook is nothing more than a picture album and an interactive alumni newsletter that relies on advertising revenue. Nothing else has changed. Facebook cannot create jobs when there is no demand, it doesn't bring our manufacturing jobs back from China. Facebook is frankly part of the problem, because it facilitates this myth that our country of 300 million can subsist in the virtual world of gossip, vanity and braindead correspondence.
 Recommend Recommended by 297 Readers
Jon Jost
Tokyo
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
"..entrepreneurs everywhere now have greater access than ever to the better and best people, robots and software everywhere..."

Of course Tom the Pied Piper of globalization neglects to mention that this corporate access is also to the cheapest labor, least environmental regulation, worker safety laws and all that. He also neglects to mention how vast money now buys up anything around the globe it wants, whether millions of acres of farmland in S America or Africa, or a lovely site for a multi-million dollar 4th vacation home on some tropical paradise whose economy is twisted into pieces thereby.

I think while offering a global vision as is his wont, Mr Friedman needs a visit to an eye doctor to correct his obsessive near-sightedness. He can't see beyond the tip of his nose for pie-ib-the-sky theories as he imagines now everyone booting up for the hyper-connected world, neglecting to note that a large chunk of the population anywhere is not composed of PhD's or people who ever could be one.

www.jonjost.wordpress.com
www.cinemaelectronica.wordpress.com
 Recommend Recommended by 167 Readers
Minneapolis
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
As nearly always, Mr Friedman's column is (affectionately) dedicated to that one-ten thousandth of one percent of the world's population who are fortunate enough to own, run, or work for massive multinational corporations. Perhaps you might lower your eyes to regard the rest of the human race someday, Mr Friedman, you might find one or two points of worth.
 Recommend Recommended by 120 Readers
Houston
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
It is hard to disagree that workers in the US have been engaged for quite a few years in an uphill and mostly loosing battle for fewer jobs. Automation and cheap foreign labor, mostly of the non-genious category, is doing in the American Dream. I would be willing to bet that many if not most of those cheap geniuses PHDs have their workrooms on foreign soil. Or, if we want to be with it by using the new lingo, their home base is not their home country, it is "the World". I have to admit that I am really impressed with the idea of the "Made in the World" label. A touch of genius there. Just when it seems that some of these business types can reach a new low, they do.

Most Americans know and have known for a good while that we have a serious job problem. Decent paying jobs are hard to find. Even the politicians are coming to this realization. The question is, what are we going to do about it? Today in the US there are roughly 190 million people of working age between 22 and 65 years. Even after we take out the very rich and the ones doing quite well with good jobs, how many geniuses are we going to find that are going to be "the best". Average does not mean incapable or dumb. It means, well, average. I am waiting to hear suggestions as to what are these millions of average people going to do to survive in this new world. Any ideas on that, Mr. Friedman? Maybe not now, but that American Spring is going to come sooner than later if this remains an issue to bring around only at election time.
 Recommend Recommended by 75 Readers
St Paul
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
I first noticed "the Great Inflection" when one of the colleges in Minnesota merged the jobs of Chief Information Officer and Physical Plant Director. With budget cuts, downsizing, etc. we are going to see more of that thinking.
 Recommend Recommended by 11 Readers
Leon Breaux
Beijing
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
Mr. Friedman, you are a very bright man and I usually agree with what you say. However, I must take a few exceptions here.

It seems to me that you yourself are caught in this mania. Humans cannot live well as you are describing. We need to slow down and take stock of the real, physical world and the real, physical other humans because that is where we live. We need to understand that the internet is a way to move data and communications around quickly, but that it hasn't changed fundamental human nature or basic problems. We need to understand that we live under an abstracted economic system that pays little heed to people's actual needs. We need to understand that all trappings aside, our social organization is not so different from a liberalized feudalism.

In an MSNBC poll, 87% of respondents say it's okay to kill a US citizen on the government's say-so that the person is a terrorist. We are through the looking-glass. 

Yes, yes, yes, the world is hyper-connected. So what? What is really changing? Are people becoming more thoughtful, more reflective, more moral, less greedy? The knife cuts both ways.

Technology is our servant, not our master. Yet we bow to it. Technology is actually people using a tool, not an entity unto itself, and when we bow to technology, we ultimately bow to those who are in charge of the tool. It is a fetishism, an idolatry, and we should be better that that.

Mr. Friedman, you know as well as I that it is impossible for average to be over. Average is a mathematical statement concerning a group of items. It exists in people and always will no matter what we say. If we are so hyped up that we forget such a simple, commonsense fact, what can be in store for us? More denial at the speed of light?

We need to slow down and breathe. We need to check what we are doing. We need to reflect. Speed is not of the essence.
 Recommend Recommended by 84 Readers
Montreal Moe
West Park, Quebec
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
Mr Friedman,
Many of us have been aware what was going on for forty years. When you wrote the world was flat we warned it was badly warped. You were wrong then and you are still unaware of what is going on.
It is sad that a gifted social commentator such as yourself should live in a middle class cocoon and should huddle with equally cocooned people and middle east aristocracy.
Your solutions have always benefited the rich and powerful to the detriment of the planet and its citizenry. Those of us who worked in technology 40 years ago knew that just as John Henry could not compete with the steam drill human being could not compete with the technological marvels we are capable of producing today. I am amazed that with your knowledge of what is going on your solutions are so misguided.
It seems obvious to me that our economic system is not capable of delivering peace, order and good government in the 21st century. The well known "secret" of survival is not competition but adaptation. I am appalled by the notion of social "Darwinists" that evolution involves survival of the strongest and most powerful. Darwin is all about adaptation and I would have hoped that given even the evidence you present in your current essay you might have understood the absolute need to adapt to a modern technological world.
We do not need to work harder, longer and smarter we need to work less and learn to deal with the time we would spend in non productive work. Instead of learning from Chinese entrepreneurs you should have focused on the Chinese government. A country losing a million plus manufacturing jobs a year tears down a 25th part of its cities every year and rebuilds thus ameliorating some unemployment. We can do better.
Early retirement, job sharing and free lifetime education are just a few ideas that could stop the impending social destruction. As Mel Brooks said to Carl Reiner many years ago "hitting a tree with a stick, that was a good job." Technology means we have enough stuf
 Recommend Recommended by 124 Readers
nicholas
atlanta
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
So people who are poor and hungry, selling their labor for pennies on the dollar, with no hope of a permanent position with any type of benefits is a good thing? Or just how it is, with people needing to realize it and accept the fact that the middle class is officially dead? 

In essence, everyone is competing with everyone for scraps and a subsistence-level existence while the people with money grow more wealthy and more powerful?

The Gilded Age is Back.
 Recommend Recommended by 182 Readers
AlanZo
Boston, MA
October 2nd, 2011
7:24 am
Global company, global mission, global objectives. This is great, and I totally support it, however labor markets remain exceptionally fragmented amongst nation states, and until a seamless global labor market emerges, one where unemployed Rustbelt workers can freely move to Guangdong to follow their jobs, and aspiring Indians IT workers can move to Silicon valley unhindered in any quantity at any time, the forces of tech-fueled income inequality will continue to grind nationally captive labor underneath the treads of globally mobile capital.

"There shall be open borders" is the absolute necessary corollary of financial and trade liberalization. Alas, it is politically impossible until cross-border incomes more or less equalize, as will happen on present course in about 20-30 years. Unfortunately, by then the centrifugal forces may have collapsed this current era of globalization. I would hate the forces of nationalism to reassert themselves once again. Einstein's quote about World War IV being fought with sticks and stones comes to mind.

Also coming to mind is the impossible trinity of the global political economy from Harvard's Dani Rodrik, which states that out of economic globalization, political democracy, and the nation state, the world system can, in any given era, satisfy at most 2 and never all 3 conditions. IMHO time to dump the nation state. Let it die... peacefully, gracefully, in due time, but the direction is clear.
 Recommend Recommended by 2 Readers
HIGHLIGHT (What's this?)
Just sayin'
Boston
October 2nd, 2011
7:28 am
If one accepts your premise that there is no more "out" in the labor pool, then what short and long term employment solutions do you propose for the developed western world, with its high labor costs and standard of living as well as its high cost social contract to its citizens? If most jobs will migrate to the best value labor pool, and if the countries with whom we compete do not have shared values or social contracts, which means we cannot compete on value, what will the West do for jobs? 

As long as we are competing against less developed countries we lose. When India, China, Thailand, etc. have developed a country wide infrastructure and governmental system of free primary education, access to health care, senior care, care for the poor, indoor plumbing, housing codes, environmental protection, human rights protection, as well as the bureaucratic burden to develop and maintain them, they will no longer be so "inexpensive" to do business with, as the costs of doing business and the standard of living will rise. Until the playing field levels out, what is the West to do? 

Do our governments/corporations have any right/need/obligation to impose barriers to the uneven field until it levels out? Many here in the US appear to feel that we should abandon our social contract and code (shrink the government, reduce regulation, let the market rule…the Republican approach) to reduce our costs, standard of living and social contract to match the developing world...I personally feel that is both morally wrong and a step backwards but I do see the allure. 

What is a short term solution? What can we, the US, do in the next 5-10 years to increase US jobs given the global situation on labor costs? Changing education will take at least 2 decades to materialize. It doesn’t mean we shouldn’t start, but it is insufficient.
 Recommend Recommended by 135 Readers
Marshfield, MA
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
Gee, Tom, a "glass is half FULL" person would see the 1 person broadcast studio as the ADDITION of a job outside the main studio that would not have otherwise been there had there not been technology to make it possible. Then, of course, there are all the people who supply, service, and visit the studio, who spend money benefitting all the business in the neighborhood that would not have otherwise benefitted.

It thought it was conservatives who wanted to return everyone to the '50's, not good progressives, but it seems this antipathy towards ATM's and other modern technology - a little creepy given the Unabomber in our past - is creeping into the group think of those most loudly proclaiming themselves the party of 'science.'

Whaddup with that?

www.anniefields.com
 Recommend Recommended by 4 Readers






















Diana
New York
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
'The connected world was a challenge to blue-collar workers in the industrialized West. They had to compete with a bigger pool of cheap labor. The hyperconnected world is now a challenge to white-collar workers. They have to compete with a bigger pool of cheap geniuses — some of whom are people and some are now robots, microchips and software-guided machines. '

Ah, no, they never HAD to compete, they were MADE to compete by the Masters of the Universe. 

It's funny how, when talking money for the monied, the earth is flat and it's a new day and things like fair trade policies and protective tariffs are so ‘yesterday,’ but when talking fair and equitable tax rates, livable wages, and regulated capitalism, why, 19th century policies are just fine.
 Recommend Recommended by 65 Readers
durham
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
Thank you for the article. It is particularly interesting with the perspective of Mr Blow's article a few weeks ago about the "War for Jobs". Basically the future will be a war for good jobs. In the past if you were on the side of country which won a war you did fairly well yourself. Now even if your country 'wins' you could still lose your job to someone from anywhere around the world. 2 points though -
1) In a hyper connected world, if we must all be prepared to lose our jobs either because someone else will do it better or cheaper if if our entire industry becomes obsolete then should we all be prepared to do something else? Plan B, second jobs? What will it be like to grow up with that kind of anxiety?

2)If there is no job security will people be prepared to put in the personal investment to become really, really good at what they do? For examples, with the onslaught of news in sound bites, blogs and brief snippets and the loss of print newspapers will any journalists takes the time to develop in depth knowledge and really build their writing skills? Mr Friedman, if you had to start with a blog would you be who you are?
In a hyper connected world do we all have to be 'Jacks' of at least a few trades and no time to be 'Masters' of anything.
 Recommend Recommended by 14 Readers
Truckee, CA
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
Please. China and many other countries practice mercantilism, the West is practicing plutocracy.Our plutocracy gives them jobs, so that we will have no power, and we can't revolt. 

http://patriceayme.wordpress.com/
 Recommend Recommended by 25 Readers
Carolyn Egeli
Valley Lee, Md.
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
Tell this to the people in the street and see what reaction you get from the unemployed. You might be accurately describing the reality, but it comes across as more darwinistic economic theory, survival of the fittest, with no social responsibility attached. Hooking up with no strings attached is what you are describing, not unlike Justice Scalia in his speech about coed dorms. We are a society, not just a bunch of people either employed or not employed. We owe something to one another. " Hooking up" by getting a good deal in a race to the bottom mentality isn't going to cut it as a way to solve our economic woes caused by unemployment. We need a sense of committment to everyone's welfare and hiding behind robotsas an argument to avoid responsibility is not going to solve our problems. So called "free markets" sounds good, but in actuality, there have never been any. That's why successful civilizations take care of their own. We've forgotten all about that concept of "giving back". There's no loyalty or devotion to any tribe anymore, and I can't say it is a good thing. I am not interested in buying from China or Africa when our own people need a way to survive. Even with so much automation, there is no excuse for our lack of loyalty to our own.
 Recommend Recommended by 27 Readers
charlotte, nc
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
This is both facinating and terrifying at the same time. While it is wonderful that hyperconnectivity brings us closer to a world community, what are we ever to do with all the debt and trappings that have kept Americans in need of high paying jobs that we have built our whole belief and financial systems around? Perhaps I can tell my mortgage and credit card holders that I was just under bid by 75% on the contract my former employer, who layed me off a year ago, had asked me to do. I really have no problem with developing countries raising the standard of living for their people, I just wish we could find a way to reconcile the fact that we are all in the same world economy and that the scale of economic expectations we have as Americans is going to have to get a bit more in line with the rest of the world. This reconciliation WILL take place. It is an open question as to whether it takes place through default, hyper inflation, or hopefully some other creative way that has yet to be revealed.
 Recommend Recommended by 12 Readers
west hollywood
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
There is an elephant in the room that no one is talking about: people have become more difficult, expensive and troublesome over the last 20 years. Yes, the new generation is very tech savvy and that's a plus. But they don't have many other attributes that made earlier generations gel as teams and seem indispensable. They lack resilience, they put self first, they are quick to file complaints. Further, while their self-esteem is amazingly high, it is seldom supported by talent. I overheard a business owner at a luncheon the other day. He said: I hire as few people as possible and make those employees accountable to an outsourced supervisor. All I need is product and an invoice; anything beyond that is TMI.
 Recommend Recommended by 11 Readers
cobbler
Union County, NJ
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
In this country we have a workforce of about 154 million people, from which about a third does things that can't be shipped to India, Mexico, China, or even 100 miles away. This leaves us with ~100 million at risk - or rather 86 mln since 14 million are already unemployed. From 86 mln I am sure 5% are immediately globally competitive; they are so smart and productive, that their designs of cafe/carwash combos could be cranked out so fast that getting $180 for the job is just fine - they could make 10 a day - or the design costs $700 but totally knocks the socks off the competition. Revamping our education system has a decent chance of bringing another 5 or 10% to this level. This leaves us with 70 million people that either need jobs that are not globally competitive, or that need to be provided for by the "top 5%"; the latter is a redistribution on a scale much greater than anything ever done even in Sweden.
Mr. Friedman never offers a solution for this group that accidentally comprises what is the bulk of our today's middle class. Solution that escapes him and every other flat earth mentality person, is economic nationalism. Tiny green sprouts of it are already emerging across the country; we need to water and fertilize them, and hopefully in a few years to gather enough will to build a virtual fence around the American jobs. This fence which should include tariffs, capital controls, as well as non-tariff preferences, will somewhat restrict the corporate profits and likely reduce the quantity of junk the average paycheck can buy. It will however make sure that our societal structure doesn't become the equivalent of Columbia's, and that a non-genius is able to provide for his or her family without the involvement of public or private charity.
 Recommend Recommended by 25 Readers
ShowMe
Missouri
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
We need to develop an economy where every person has the chance to make a living and to live a satisfying life, which includes having the knowledge that their life has meaning through the products of their efforts and their relationships with other people. If this is socialist, then I believe that we must not be so narrow in our thinking that we reject it.
 Recommend Recommended by 17 Readers
mancuroc
Rochester, NY
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
No more "in" or "out"? Arrant nonsense! As anyone exposed to today's labor market knows, you are either "in" or "out" of a job. It matters not where the job went - it either went overseas or it went away completely. Vast numbers of people have been de-skilled, told to learn new skills and dutifully obeyed, only to find that they are competing with newly minted graduates for a decreasing pool of skilled jobs. Tom, where do YOU think the vast majority of those people from the TV studios went?
 Recommend Recommended by 29 Readers
J Connors
Durham
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
$268 for a fully functioning dune buggy? $168 for a car washing cafe? $375 for six formulations of chewing gum?

Obviously you don't know a scam when you see one, do you?

These people will pay their "bids" and never hear another word unless they have at least $100,000 to hire a lawyer.

This scam has been going on for over a hundred years.
 Recommend Recommended by 24 Readers
Al in Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
Several thoughts come to mind. Here are a few:
1. Corporations are not looking for the best and brightest; they are looking for the cheapest workers for the particular niche application, however sophisticated. The idea of hiring the best people for a long career with the enterprise is so 1950's.
2. The idea of managing complex projects, (eg, the 787), using ad-hoc collections of independent entities is likely to be as successful in the long run as the success of a loose confederation of city states against an integrated nation state under strong leadership. (eg the Greeks vs. Alexander or Northern Italy vs. France and Austria) Some members of the confederation will always try to find a better deal for themselves at the expense of the project.
3. There have been a lot of commments to the effect that large globalized companies are better credit risks than sovereign goverments in these days of concern over national debts. Seems to me that these comments ignore the very real power of governments to commandeer the assets of the companies either through taxation, policy, or outright confiscation/nationalization.
 Recommend Recommended by 6 Readers
C Landrey
New England
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
So, Matt Barrie describes his own team as "poor and hungry?" He must be proud of that achievement.
 Recommend Recommended by 22 Readers
krish
ri
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
World is evolving - It looks like a teenager that is transforming into an adult. So, the changes are so fast.

In stone age, there ws no iron tools. In bronze age, humans developed tools. So on and on....the changes were happening so slowly then. But, now the changes are happening so fast.

I would, however, look this from another angle. Isn't the very definition of what is fast and what is slow changing today?
Times are changing, but so are the effects of time changing. A gradual transformation would have not been noticed so suspiciously.

But, again isn't the way we judge change changing?
What if I go a thousand years back and try to judge the changes occurring at that time? Will I judge in the same way as when a person from that age comes to our age and judges these changes?

Let us reflect on what is actually changing.
 Recommend Recommended by 0 Readers
Josh
Oyster Bay, NY
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
If, as Thomas Friedman states, "average is definitely over", then average, normal, everyday people will have -- how shall I put it? -- a big problem. That isn't a recipe for a pleasant future for our society.
 Recommend Recommended by 33 Readers
Laura
NYC
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
Really? Then why is China continuing to buy US treasuries in order to keep the value of their currency artificially low? Why does Japan go to great lengths to close its market to foreign competition? Why is South Korea the only country where Japanese automakers can't sell any cars? How did Canada manage to win Hollywood from the US? And why does every country but the US have plans to become more economically competitive? 

These countries see what Americans don't want to. Country borders still matter. And we'll discover how much only once we've already given away the farm.
 Recommend Recommended by 48 Readers
jorge Rosaly
puerto rico
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am

the real problem is the reality you correctly described ,in my opinion, there is no room for" medium intelligece people" who constitute our middle class.in this scenery where every society wants the same rewards,meaning wealth,and the resources are limited,sooner or later there is going to be a big war.

jorge rosaly
 Recommend Recommended by 6 Readers
Karen
Philadelphia Suburbs
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
The world may be flat, but people still have to live in a particular location - and cost of living still varies greatly from one area to the next. If the world job market becomes one market, then presumably the cost of housing would have to adjust to one market as well. Relatively small decreases in home values caused a near-depression in the U.S. - what would happen if housing prices dropped to 1/10 of their values to match housing prices in China or India? But if you're earning Chinese wages, you can't pay American prices for your apartment or house.
 Recommend Recommended by 19 Readers
Mike
Francestown, NH
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
I am an engineer working for a major robot company designing and building cutting edge robots. As far as I know, there is currently no agreed upon definition of the word robot. The best that the research community has come up with is a mechanism that 1) senses it's environment, 2) can change it's environment, and 3) can move in it's environment. The devices you describe do not fit the criteria. In the future there will be robots that do, and they will be in your life, for better or worse. But until then, please do not confuse the term with mere advanced technology. Arthur C. Clark said: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." The fact that a mousetrap is more advanced does not make it a robotic mousetrap. Please be accurate in your language, otherwise you risk spreading the imprecise thinking that is currently in vogue. And anyone who risks that risks us all.
 Recommend Recommended by 11 Readers
comp
MD
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
Mr. Friedman: the future you see--working harder and smarter and longer, producing more and more and buying more and more to maintain our economies--cannot. be. sustained. There are way too many people in the world and way too few resources. High technology will not save us. 

Start banging the drum of birth control and downsizing our needs--and start praying for the messiah.
 Recommend Recommended by 16 Readers
The Deputy
Pescadero, CA
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
My question is this: if robots/software/productivity are eliminating jobs left and right, what will people do to make a living? The population is GROWING not shrinking. The promise of productivity was to make our lives better (work less, more leisure time, etc.) Won't these factors only continue to gut the middle class? How long before the robot asks "would you like fries with that?"
 Recommend Recommended by 28 Readers
Brad
Arizona
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
Mr Friedman's overall conclusions are reasonable, and they are behind some of the great decline in the American middle class that is motivating so much of the anger and fear of the Tea Party movement. 

There is a second factor besides hyper-connectivity that needs to be recognized: the global spread of education. For the past 65 years, education has been seen as the pathway to economic success throughout the world. Education was seen as the way to reduce poverty in the developing world and to reduce poverty in low-income regions and blighted inner cities in the developed world. 

There was a fallacy in this vision. Greatly expanding the numbers of educated people did promote economic development, but the income returns for education would decline as the supply of educated persons rapidly caught up to and exceeded the demand. Look at the problems in the Middle East and Europe: there is massive unemployment of young people with university degrees. There is increasing under-employment of university graduates in the USA. Investments in education no longer provide to an individual the same payback as they did in the past - but there is no alternative, as extreme poverty is the alternative.

Hyper-connectivity and a highly educated global population means that the "middle class" will no longer be concentrated in the USA, Europe and Japan. Some of it will be in China, India, Brazil, Russia and another dozen or so nations. The middle class that is left in the US, Europe and Japan will increasingly interact with the rest of global middle class. The global middle class will be spread all over the planet, and those in it will do what they can so that their children have a chance to move int the global elite, or at least remain middle class. 

Yes, the global elite. Their existence has been obvious for the last few decades. The US and the EU must go after their tax havens and their financial practices.
 Recommend Recommended by 8 Readers
Slideguy
San Francisco
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
You know, the problem is considerably simpler, but more intractable than Friedman makes it out to be. There are simply nowhere enough decent jobs to employ the US work force. And since corporations went multi-national, the thrust is to find the cheapest labor on the planet for any given job. And the multinationals are now employing governments like our own to maintain order so that they can extract the last penny of profit, the general welfare be damned.

Instead of our government acting on its Constitutional mandate to promote the general welfare, it is now employed by organizations that have no patriotism or loyalty to the US to protect them while they steal from us.
 Recommend Recommended by 70 Readers
cynikall
nj
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
... people bid on projects/jobs for less than $500. care to explain how they can recover their cost or live on that?
 Recommend Recommended by 23 Readers
HIGHLIGHT (What's this?)
toronto, canada
October 2nd, 2011
7:31 am
Is this the brave new world for new jobs, where the highest bidder for an innovatory project is less than $400? These people could do better busking in the subway, if they had any talent.
 Recommend Recommended by 63 Readers
Boston MA
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Doesn't everyone know this already?

The price of US labor (white or blue collar) has been too high on the global market because has been protected by barriers to entry, so it was too difficult to arbitrage the excess price away. Now, as Mr. Friedman points out, those barriers are gone.

What is not known is how the US economy will achieve the repricing of its labor. It could be through continued underemployment of the labor force, reducing the global spending power of Americans through reduced total wages, or through inflation, leading to a lower value of the dollar on world markets. I'd be interested in Mr. Friedman's views on this choice.
 Recommend Recommended by 5 Readers


Ne d Welker
Prescott AZ
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
It isn't like replacement of people with robots is new or that people who can, work for themselves, and those who cannot work for others, is it? As a person in my seventh decade of life, I have often observed, as have my elderly retired friends, that it would be intolerable to be young enough to have to make a go of it in today's world. Everything has changed, and it seems the change came overnight for many. Old war horses like me and my friends are as redundant as old 78 rpm Victrolas but there are many young people who are finding as many opportunities in today's world as I and my friends found in yesterday's. The fate of those who wait for someone to level the playing field, or bring fairness into the equation was set when I was young just as it is set for the youth of today. Individual strength comes from within, not without and from what I can see, there are plenty of opportunities if people will seize them.....just like there have always been.
 Recommend Recommended by 3 Readers
Dallas, Texas
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Those managers can also be replaced. As a matter of fact, we can all be replaced and from generation to generation, indeed we are replaced. As a nation we need to rethink some very basic concepts such as: the purpose of national government, the goals of a public education system, the credibility of attaining very high levels of education and etc. Who does globalization benefit? In the long term, does it create world wide shortages of certain commodities? 

The new world is already becoming terrible for those clinging to the old!
 Recommend Recommended by 14 Readers
Felipe
Orlando
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
I have been telling a lot of people that technology, besides the financial strike been hold by the financial institucions because they are not lending to anybody regarless their good credit and the war economy mentality of managers "do more with less" (hiring freeze), is an important factor in the high unemployment rate. Five years ago I paid my tolls to a person. Today is deducted by epass. Before I spoke to a insurance broker, travel agent, bank representative, cable operador. Today I speak to a computer and if I need to speak to a customer service I get someone with a strong accent some where in the other side of the world. Companies won't be hiring again until they get financing to grow, they understant that the recession is over, and politicians quit preaching the end of the world.
 Recommend Recommended by 4 Readers
Paul
Brooklyn, NY
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
So what is the conclusion to be drawn here? That eventually we'll all be working for pennies, or not at all? The one hitch in the road corporate capitalism has chosen is that robots don't have emotional or physical needs that drive consumption. Though I wouldn't be surprised to discover that the geniuses who brought us the internet, artificial intelligence, exchange-traded derivatives and credit default swaps have this all figured out. That's why they'll be the last ten people on the planet holding down jobs while the rest of us forage and beg, or (for the lucky ones living in places with social safety nets) live off the dole.
 Recommend Recommended by 9 Readers
Jay Fleming
South Texas
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
I saw you tell this same story on C-Span the other night, and thought then how inadequate was the answer that you and your co-author gave. Better education may provide a key for the relative handful who have the rare mixture of intelligence, drive and resourcefulness to rise above the pack. But a combination of factors including outsourcing, corporate merger mania, increased efficiency and automation that are the unseen drivers in the current employment crisis have significantly reduced the demand for "average" blue-collar and white-collar employees in our country. Good luck helping them all retool for competition against your 'bigger pool of cheap geniuses'.

I fear we are going to find over the next few years that our system of government may be unable to do anything significant to alter this trend. Mere economic stimulus is decried as socialism. But if nothing is done, don't be surprised if we witness the rise of a guerilla movement or movements which seek to cripple or destroy major portions of the electronic apparatus by which the world is hyperconnected and much of its population is rendered 'unnecessary'.
 Recommend Recommended by 14 Readers
joechill
Winona, mn
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
I'll tell what's in and what's out. The top 1% is in. The rest of us are out. The love of free trade means that middle class Americans will soon be at the level of our Indian and Chinese counterparts because "we" now all believe that workers have no rights and that nation-states are economically obsolete. As a consequence, if you're in, that must mean you are a smarter and harder worker than those who are out. Clearly, there cannot be impediments to advancements in Tom's world. The world is flat, and we are all equal in it, and if you aren't equal, you don't deserve to be.
 Recommend Recommended by 30 Readers
Richard G
Nanjing, China
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
What you describe is a "Road Warrior" world absent the nuclear holocaust - which comes instead in a financial version. This does not demand a change in perception or preparation. It instead demands a change in the way the world is manipulated by the concentrated rich to squeeze ever more out of the world's expanding poor. It demands a revolution.
 Recommend Recommended by 16 Readers
Boulder, UT
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Tom -
You always make these technological changes sound so positive! But, and it's a big one, unless we find a way to reorganize our global society there is big trouble brewing. 

When measuring IQ we choose 100 as the average intelligence. That means that one half of all people fall below that level. There was a time when these folks could find a job that would supply basic needs doing manual tasks such as manufacturing. Now, thanks to businesses always looking to compete and create profit we find hugh numbers of people disenfranchized in a marketplace that no longer needs them, not just here but world wide. 

Also, as your world of wonder and high tech spreads there are many people who just don't have the ability to function in this highly complex environment. The stress of this - Brave New World - is already showing in a rise in stress related disease.

There is a growing gap not just between the very rich and all of the rest of us, but also between the techno-intelligencia and the average Joe/Jane. There is a tremendous amount of resentment, just look at the Tea Party and Climate change deniers.

Ah, Brave New World! It doesn't look so promising from wher I sit.
 Recommend Recommended by 17 Readers
Al
Virginia Beach
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Piecework attracts several bids all under $200. Awful and the article uncomprehendingly remarks upon it as if they represent an evolution toward something.
 Recommend Recommended by 54 Readers
Matt
Upstate NY
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
I know this is your dream world, Mr. Friedman--everyone an entrepeneur, everyone working 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, madly competing with everyone else in the world to be the best, continually coming up with new innovations, frenetically producing, producing, producing. But while I don't deny that this describes the reality of some people, the truth is that your picture has nothing to do with my life or the life of anyone I know. And I deeply hope that I never live to see the day when it does.
 Recommend Recommended by 111 Readers
L.R.
Upstate New York
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Try this one: a world where the only value people have is in filling a job is a world where people without jobs are disposable - and the economy has every incentive to make them so. If the only reason for people to exist is as a cog in the economic machine, then we're going to have one hell of a surplus population to deal with.

Soylent green, anyone? It's that or we figure out something else for people to do here.
 Recommend Recommended by 15 Readers
Jeofree
New York
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
And yet all actual data clearly shows that were the economy healthy and growing, unemployment would be down to 4 or 5%, that is, virtually full employment, instead of at 9% as it is now. There is a huge lack of demand for products and services, and people can actually measure it, and were that demand there, then unemployment would drop. 

The idea that all of the jobs that were there three or four years ago when we had full employment, that these have suddenly vanished coinciding with the worst economic downturn in a century, but not because of it, this is absurd.

Some of this that Friedman writes about is obviously happening, automation and so on, but they can actually study how much it affects the employment level and it's insignificant. Old style jobs are vanishing but new ones are being invented, and yes it's a struggle for people with old skills who need new ones and so on, but the point is that all data shows that were the economy growing at a fast pace, people would be working to the tune of almost no unemployment.
 Recommend Recommended by 5 Readers
William Taylor
Nampa, ID
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Since in the end, life--and an economy--is about people, what you are describing is a society that is hollowing out from within. Gone the blue-collar workers with no way to give them a life of dignity, and gone the white collar workers who despised the unions and thought they were immune.
 Recommend Recommended by 9 Readers
Rex Dawson
Santa Cruz, CA
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Very interesting that you mentioned freelancer.com. Apparently, you only spoke to the CEO and didn't bother to actually look at the "jobs" being offered, which include a large number where the client (hiring party) wants to pay $2/$3/$4 per hour to the person who accepts the job. Is that really a reasonable wage? Is the website exempt from federal minimum wage requirements? Sounds more like a technological sweatshop to me. As to your premise that gee, willikers isn't it great that companies and their jobs are transnational, the rub lies in the fact that citizens/jobseekers aren't. So if capital finds cheaper borders outside the USA, American jobseekers are not free to follow. The upside from the transnational nature of corporations has been pretty one-sided thus far (benefits the corporations), and sadly, you seem to have been a long-term proponent and cheering section for this outcome.
 Recommend Recommended by 37 Readers
MattyP
NYC
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
And the question remains: what do you do with the other 6 Billion (and counting) on the planet?
 Recommend Recommended by 14 Readers
Baltimore
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Friedman presents us with a vision of the world in which the "average" and even the "good" are unable to compete for jobs with the "better" and "best" - TF forgot to mention "wealthiest." There's no doubt that this is happening. But do we really want a future in which the world is divided between those who could "swim" and those who couldn't? What are the average and good supposed to do? Wait tables? Drink? Eventually, if technological progress continues at its current rate (and there's no sign it'll slow), we will find that we're all replaceable by robots or computers. It's time to rethink the ruthless and taken-for-granted logic of sink or swim, kill or be killed, and imagine ways that these incredible new technologies and means of connectivity might assist us in creating happier, less stressful lives for everyone, the average as well as the extraordinary. If this smells of socialism, that's not a mistake.
 Recommend Recommended by 16 Readers
Andy
Palo Alto CA
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Your description of our economic near-future earns a +1 from me. It is also true that this coming world will put severe wage pressure on every American. 

People get ready. Every individual is going to have to work like hell to keep up in the near-future. But also - we need a collective strategy to keep our living standards high. What is that strategy? 

Technology is making our economy more efficient, but our system is structured to deliver all the productivity gains to the Oligarchs. You're going to be left to fight for the scraps against people who will work for a fraction of your wage.
 Recommend Recommended by 9 Readers
Carol Benedict Russell
Shelter Island, New York
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
New Job: Invent Something: anything and build it quickly. If it is
a better whatever and makes your life a lot easier, well it will
most likely be wanted by someone else. Just don't outsource yourself.
Stay away from the big banks and stay way way under the US government
radar, so they can't take your profits and your entire idea. 

Guess that says it all: Just do not trust the US Government at all.!!!
 Recommend Recommended by 1 Reader
Portland, Oregon
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
I think Friedman nailed it. We are killing our economy (and ultimately ourselves) with our own technology. By technology, I mean the internet, robotics, GPS, rapid transportation, and instant world-wide communication. These marvelous advances enable predictable and reliable just-in-time delivery of products manufactured by the cheapest supplier in any part of the world. Friedman outlined that so well in "The World Is Flat" when he describes and traces the order processing, manufacturing and delivery of a Dell notebook he purchased. To me, it appeared very little was done by US workers. 

Of course this was just the tip of the global economy iceberg we would crash into. Can we blame our corporations for rushing out to secure cheaper parts and labor in far away countries any more than we can blame consumers that bought the cheapest, often from the internet, with a wink and grin? No, I think not. We are all share the blame, just as we all shared the savings. But now our breached hull continues taking on water while the iceberg of globalization drifts with in the currents. 

Like water seeking it own level, money, jobs and quality of life are leaving wealthy countries like ours, and bolstering the fortunes and futures of the poor, but stable progressive countries. The America we knew growing up in the 50's through the 90's, is, I fear, long gone... and not coming back.
 Recommend Recommended by 3 Readers
NY, NY
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
So, basically, what you are saying is that unless we are in the top .01%, we are completely TOAST? If the "average" person has no chance of survival in post-industrial America, we will either need to build a massive social safety or learn to embrace that the new dark ages are upon us, as 99.9% of the population starves, while the wealth build ever-larger gated estates....
 Recommend Recommended by 45 Readers
Terence Hughes
New York, NY
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Gee, Tom, again you fail to ask the most obvious of questions: How the hell is anyone going to live on, oh, $157 for a few days' work, especially when they have to pay their withholding tax, other taxes, health insurance premium, rent, food, and the baby's shoes? What if any human conclusions are you capable of drawing from this depressing set of examples?

Oh, wait -- "Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?" 

We're back in the earlier parts to the 19th century in many ways, and all you can do is spout some carefully selected evidence? How about suggesting that this system is untenable for any country that aspires to more than desperate subsistence for its citizens? Or is it your contention that there are lots (privately-run) prisons and feudal factories for the people who may be "geniuses" but who somehow count for a lot less than the people who pay your salary and your speaking fees?

Your is a de facto apologia for the continuation of this hypercorrupt order you wax so eloquent about. We might just set our sights on 14th-century serfdom as a model; it sure seems like we're headed that way. 

Goodbye, America.
 Recommend Recommended by 80 Readers
J. E. L.
Arizona
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
Mr. Friedman once again hits the nail on the head...pretty much. The individual in the new economy will be lost to actual productivity that benefits in both the small and the large unless current political problems are resolved. I can do the job and get paid, but for this rising tide, not everybody is in the boat, and they will need to be. What a great argument for the arts and creativity training.
 Recommend Recommended by 1 Reader
Peter
CT
October 2nd, 2011
7:36 am
3000 BC Egypt: Owners utilize cheap programmed labor, aka slaves. Owners utilize mechanized solutions, aka block and pulleys. Owners think beyond their borders, aka the valley of the living and the valley of death.

Hi Ho, Hi Ho, Off to work we go.
 Recommend Recommended by 9 Readers
HIGHLIGHT (What's this?)
KH
Idaho
October 2nd, 2011
7:47 am
I came of age during the worst part of the Recession of the 80s and found that in order to make a living I was going to have to create my own job, which I did throughout my 20s and 30s. It was exhausting, working constantly, hustling constantly, not being able to obtain health insurance. People younger and older ensconced themselves in well paying jobs that I couldn't find. I couldn't always guarantee assignments would come in so I worked a night job too for a few years, putting in an exhausting schedule. I had no health insurance because I had a medical condition that rendered me uninsurable to private companies. But I was young and figured with a bit of luck and by being careful with my health, I had lots of time to move up in the world. 

Then I turned 40 and realized I had "made it" in the field I was working in. I also looked at the fact that I could work at McDonalds for a greater hourly rate than I was making because my work was always feast and famine. I wanted an easier way to make a living. So I went back to school, changed professions and 10 years later am successful at a job that requires a lot of creativity and the same managerial, go-getting skills I learned as a freelancer. 

The point is - look at all these bids. Freelancers are not valued any more than they were in my day. They are doing what I did, working for starvation "wages" and hustling for work against other creative, hungry people. It's a hard life, having to constantly reinvent yourself: for how many years -- after age 50, 60, 70, 80? I don't where all this is going to lead, but having come of age during those lean years when there was no work for young people, I'm constantly learning new skills, and have even become bilingual. But going for yet another degree now is out-of-the-question due to cost and the knowledge that student loans are a bad idea at my time of life. I plan to one day retire when I'm 71 or so, or at least semi retire, not reinvent myself until I drop.
 Recommend Recommended by 84 Readers
Scott
Seattle
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
The world you describe where people in developed nations have to compete with everyone in the third world for preposterously low wages ignores the fact that the architect in Bangladesh doesn't have to pay $1000/month for a studio apartment, doesn't have to carry insurance, doesn't have to pay US taxes, doesn't have to find a way to pay for unaffordable medical insurance, doesn't have the outrageous prices for food, etc.

The notion that there should be free trade between high wage and low wage countries is preposterous. By opening up endless sources of labor in markets that will never buy what is produced by that labor is a ticket straight to the third world for everyone in the developed world.

International corporations have no loyalty to anyone. They seek only to extract as efficiently as possible and they should be destroyed. Encouraging the best and brightest to emmigrate to the United States is a wonderful idea. The bring their genius here and spend their earnings here. Simply allowing the free flow of labor across the globe without regard to taxes, cost of living or the myriad of other things that place the first world at a disadvantage.

The path you describe will leave the United States decimated and will result in a bloody revolution when 90% of our population is left to starve as the predatory multinationals run off with the wealth of the globe.
 Recommend Recommended by 37 Readers


Digoweli
New York City
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
At such ridiculously low prices for serious specialized work, how will they have the money to buy anything? A guaranteed income maybe? Your ideas just don't add up. The flat world has been the arts since 1929 and all it did was destroy the economic basis for the arts and turn it all non-profit and dependent upon guaranteed income called grants and patrons at Lincoln Center. Think Thomas!
 Recommend Recommended by 8 Readers
Nagoya, Japan
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
When I look at the books getting published today, the music being recorded, and the movies being made, I would have to disagree emphatically that average is over. Average is more in than ever. It is excellence that is so over.
 Recommend Recommended by 17 Readers
Iowa, USA
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
The question we face is what are we going to do with the people who are unable to snag one of these jobs? Will we let them go hungry, homeless, and uneducated? Or will we make a solid, real, and lasting commitment to care for the humans displaced by the machines we've made.

Efficiency and profit are not the only criteria for success. We must also keep our compassion and humanity.
 Recommend Recommended by 9 Readers
trickyday4
ohio
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
Tom's best article in a long time, it's theme is correct and critically important. This should just be the start however, the country needs to be discussing it's implications and what do we do about it. A real example, companies that use forklift trucks are increasingly paying 3 times the cost of the basic forklift for an option that permits it to be run REMOTELY, with no operator. That is how much companies are willing to pay to avoid hiring a forklift operator. I'm sure other readers have similar anecdotes.
 Recommend Recommended by 4 Readers
Vince
Toronto, ON
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
I don't disagree with your diagnosis. With the globe as connected as it is, everyone is bidding for work, be it through the 1000's of resumes that get submitted for single job openings or through the website you mention where you literally race to the bottom in order to find work. 

But if as you say there is no hope for "average" and little hope for "good", what happens to people who fall into those categories? All of us like to think that we fall into the "better" or "best" groups, but by definition, more than half of the people in the world fall into the "average" or lower groups. So what happens to "them"? Should they just take the minimum wage or lower job and hope no one better comes along to steal it from them? Does humanity wind up sending the majority of people off into the slums to fend for themselves while the elites gorge themselves on the wealth of the world? 

Looking at government and corporate policies throughout the world today, the worst of them being the "unemployed need not apply" policies, the answer is clearly yes.
 Recommend Recommended by 13 Readers
Steve
OH
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
This column is one of the most depressing views of the future I've seen. It is depressing because of the lack of understanding of basic human needs that underlies its assumptions - that the world is open for everyone to become a freelancer, an entrepreneur, a business start up, that we can move at will or would want to in order to be "employed." But the truth is that the vast majority of people are not cut out for that kind of competitive world and there is no training or education that will prepare them for it. That is because what people - human beings - really want is home, security, family, and community. The vision laid out here is the antithesis of what builds human communities. It's not that people don't want to be part of the world, travel, grow, or expand, that is not it. It is rather that the vision laid out here will actually produce the opposite effect than described here. How do I know this? Because we already have more than enough evidence from globalization and "outsourcing" to know this is true. The destruction of community and cultures is going ahead at a frightening pace. Corporations now have far more power than any one government. The small reed of hope we have is to actually push back against the hyper connectedness described and instead push for interconnectedness beginning with our communities and building upon that. The future described is not an advance, but rather a great lost of community, diversity, and spirit.
 Recommend Recommended by 59 Readers
brooklyn, ny
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
How I became a robot at my job ...
At large institutions, professional skills are becoming compartmentalized to narrow functions. Supposedly if a process requires a skill X then anyone with that skill can do the job equally well. Interchangeability works well with inanimate objects but not with people. A normal person performing the same routine is supposed to learn how to do it better and more importantly how to improve the process and prevent issues. If you do something well you are either promoted untill you no longer effective or your skills are invisible or you work yourself out of job because you manage to streamline your process to a zero effort or eliminate the need for the process.

If every skill, process, equipment is generic, interchangeable, commoditized what makes a particular enterprise special compared to another one? I presume it
 Recommend Recommended by 0 Readers
Malvern, PA.
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
Your explanation of the changes is interesting and accurate, though you do not touch on the response which some of us, older people who have witnessed these changes take place before our eyes, and who have decided to persist to the bitter end in the belief that there is still free choice in life and that one does not have to be a part of the flock and may still be a part of the independent herd.

Aware for fifty years that purchasing foreign cars and other capital goods had a severe impact on American jobs, as has been amply demonstrated in recent years, and having seen the devastation caused to small towns throughout the nation by Wallmart and its clones, it is easy to conduct ones purchases on an America first principle. In fact my preference for the past fifty years has been to always look for the country of origin label and select products made in the US, Canada and Mexico only and absolutely reject all others, with the only exceptions being wine and cheese.

Patronizing Wallmart, then becoming unemployed and continuing to do so, is indicative of a mind numbing insensitivity of, the American worker. In renting a car recently and stating to the clerk handling the paperwork that my selection must be an American made and an American brand, he was perplexed, since he said that certain of the Asian and European makes were made in the USA. True indeed, though as a consumer I prefer to be more explicit and opt for my preference, since more US jobs depend upon the standards I apply. A tiny fraction of the consumer population no doubt, and in the depression and joblessness now all about us a seemingly futile gesture though if taken up by more consumers, some American jobs may yet be saved.

It seems that pride in the Made in the USA label has gone by the wayside without the remotest realization of how it has devastated our economy. Sad to say its principle victims are the jobless and the middle class who never gave it a thought then and still don't.
 Recommend Recommended by 16 Readers
California
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
What you always miss in your stories is the economic boom that could be triggered immediately in this country if oil companies were allowed to drill for oil and gas anywhere in the U.S. I said in the U.S. No way to outsource to Brazil or Russia or Cuba. It would take place right here. Look at North Dakota where drilling is going full blast and they have 3% unemployment. Stop your silly propaganda on solar and wind which are outsourced to China. Open your eyes, stop dreaming, tell it like it is. Drill, baby, drill and this economy will take off like a rocket. You have to lock your hatred for oil companies in a closet, let them do their work. Oil and gas drilling in this country cannot be outsourced, period. Wake up, Mr. Friedman!!!!!!
 Recommend Recommended by 3 Readers
kgeographer
Santa Barbara, CA
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
If there is no "in" and "out" -- regarding nations that is -- then a very large percentage of Americans can expect their fortunes to descend to a level meeting the upward rise of growing economies.

The antidote to this is restoring some sense of society, even nationalism. Whatever happened to "Buy American?" Are we enough of a society that we decide to ensure good livelihoods for our citizens? Increasingly, I think not. Friedman's flat world is also borderless, and while that might be appealing on some level, it is absolutely destructive of our middle-class.

Good night and good luck.
 Recommend Recommended by 4 Readers
Leonard
NYC
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
Tom, unemployment is 16%, not 9.1%. An important distinction.

The employment/unemployment scenario you describe essentially guarantees that increasing numbers of people will be out of work, regardless of education, as automation advances and population surges, with a pool of now 7 billion, soon to be 9 billion people for the international companies that "hover" (to use your current word) over the world to exploit.
 Recommend Recommended by 4 Readers
Don Seekins
Waipahu, Hawaii
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
"Indeed, there is no “in” or “out” anymore. In the hyperconnected world, there is only “good” “better” and “best,” and managers and entrepreneurs everywhere now have greater access than ever to the better and best people, robots and software everywhere."

Mr. Friedman, this is a little like a Roman in the 1st century BC saying "there are no such things as freemen making stuff or growing crops anymore in Italy; not when Gaul and Greece can provide us with as many slaves as we need!" Depriving people of their livelihoods in the name of "hyperconnectivity" is as meaningless and immoral as slavery.
 Recommend Recommended by 14 Readers
George Chen
Washington D.C.
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
Brilliant observation. The hyperconnected world resulting in higher productivity is very good globally even if it means temporary high unemployment. I remember attending Columbia Univeristy commencement ceremony in 2009 when the Journalism school dean lamented about hundreds of graduates are not going to find any employment in today's hyperconnected news media world. 

In the long run, flat or hyperconected world can only bring positive aspects to human civilization. More likely for nations to engage in trade exchange than confrontation. This is the best way to bring peace and prosperity to the world. On the other hand, building Great Wall barrier like ancient China did never will resolve any problem.
 Recommend Recommended by 0 Readers
TmNY
New York
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
An immediate 50% American tariff on all imported goods (as opposed to labor) is needed. 

Someone said to me, "A nation that cannot clothe and feed itself cannot survive." 

That seems reasonable to me. 

America needs to re-institute the American tariff. Like the one Alexander Hamilton first instituted to protect American jobs. 

This would not only create American jobs here on a giant scale, it would also balance our budget almost immediately. 

And if one looks at the record of history, it's clear that America's phenomenal rise, from a agrarian colony to a gigantic economic power, starting with the years of George Washington's presidency (1790) all the way through the American Civil War, and up to World War I (1914), was made possible by an American tariff on foreign goods. 

Take a look at the very successful history of American tariffs here, in Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff
 Recommend Recommended by 16 Readers
Bejay
Williamsburg VA
October 2nd, 2011
7:56 am
Average is over? Most people are, by definition, average or below. Only a minority can ever be above average. If only the best can succeed in the modern world, then the majority are condemned to failure. 

What do we plan to do with all the people who are only average? Is the idea of the vast majority of people being able to live a decent life now a pipe dream? 

Once, America was regarded as the best "poor man's country" in the world, where the ordinary average man could build a life for himself. No more.
 Recommend Recommended by 27 Readers
Fred Drumlevitch
Tucson, Arizona
October 2nd, 2011
12:44 pm
"Indeed, there is no 'in' or 'out' anymore. In the hyperconnected world, there is only 'good' 'better' and 'best,' and managers and entrepreneurs everywhere now have greater access than ever to the better and best people, robots and software everywhere." [Tom Friedman]

As is frequently the case, Mr. Friedman, you've missed the real point: In the hyperconnected world, there is only "cheap" "cheaper" and "cheapest", and the result of the United States travelling down that path --- through trade, tariff, and corporate tax policies, and corporate and financial market priorities --- has been a severe erosion of the U.S. middle class, and complete unemployability for many in our bottom class. Those consequences, and worse, are the inevitable results of a political and economic system that gives corporations the legal rights of people, and that intensely values price and profit while giving little thought to real people.

Oscar Wilde's well-known quote, with some additions, seems particularly appropriate here: The bean counters of our corporations "know the price of everything", worldwide --- labor costs, raw materials costs, waste disposal costs, shipping costs --- "and the value of nothing". Corporate management and their government lackeys certainly don't know the value of their fellow human beings --- or don't care --- and are willing to consign them to poverty and misery, while they themselves in their rationalizing smugness travel home to their mansions, satisfied that "God's in the Hamptons, All's well with the world!". (Apologies to Browning).

www.FredDrumlevitch.blogspot.com
 Recommend Recommended by 8 Readers
San Diego, CA
October 2nd, 2011
12:45 pm
Dear Mr. Friedman:

Well, there is certainly an "in" and an "out" when paying the rent and buying food. I used to live in Thailand where I paid $75 in monthly rent and spent $.50 for dinner. I lived well on $6,000 a year. Now as I try to start a career in freelance copyediting from my home in the US using Elance, I discover I am competing with English-speaking expats in Thailand and elsewhere. They can afford to take month-long assignments for $400. When they bid $400 for a month-long assignment and I bid what I need to pay the bills and indulge in such luxuries as food, I don't stand a chance. Maybe in "the cloud" there is no "in" or "out," but in the grocery store and the mail box where I send off my bills, "in" and "out" are alive and well. Yes, I could try to convince the author that I have something special to offer, something that makes me stand above the guy from Thailand. But in these times, how many authors, many of whom are struggling financially for all the same reasons, will be persuaded to spend more than twice that $400 the editor from Thailand is offering? What you must understand is that the huge savings the editor from Thailand is offering IS what makes him stand out to a struggling author.

I guess it's my fault for not being flexible enough. I could move to Bangladesh, live in a shack over a sewer, work 25 hours a day and eat the rats I catch in my shack. But we Americans have gotten so spoiled.
 Recommend Recommended by 27 Readers
WDA
Los Angeles
October 2nd, 2011
12:46 pm
Mr. Friedman hits the nail on the head. Americans need to wake up and smell the coffee and the tea and the mango and the sushi and the curry and the boba. Eventually, all high end work will become highly mobile. But this is the dawn of a wonderful time on our planet, filled with great opportunities as billions of people rise out of poverty. Rejoice and compete!
 Recommend Recommended by 2 Readers
BJ
CANBERRA ACT
October 2nd, 2011
12:46 pm
TOM I have followed your columns for years but have not noticed what you think will be the societal fallout from this unbridled competition.What happens to the low and mid range talents that cannot compete?Should they starve ,be euthanized, forever marginalized in slums on the outskirts of silicon valleys. If the future is exclusively social Darwinism in outlook what are the political ramifications?Perhaps a long column on the geopolitical consequences of your projections is in order.
 Recommend Recommended by 9 Readers
C
NYC
October 2nd, 2011
12:47 pm
Best essay I have read in support of trade barriers and tariffs! Without trade barriers all that matters is having capital, since labor is essentially worthless, all the more so in the hyper-connected world.
 Recommend Recommended by 7 Readers
Zurich
October 2nd, 2011
12:47 pm
'Obviously, this makes it more vital than ever that we have schools elevating and inspiring more of our young people into that better and best category, because even good might not cut it anymore and average is definitely over.'

Half the population is average or below. Are you predicting 50% unemployment?
 Recommend Recommended by 8 Readers
BubbaReagan
Aether
October 2nd, 2011
12:47 pm
singularity here we come! My hunch is that we will see a wave of protectionism in the US and the Eu sweeping in the the next 15 years. just like the dark ages around the late 19th century and the 1930. we already had a global networked econonmy, twice....
 Recommend Recommended by 1 Reader
SBATT
Oxford, UK
October 2nd, 2011
12:47 pm
I thought the implication was "average is getting bigger and angrier, not 'average is definitely over.'"
 Recommend Recommended by 2 Readers
Richard Doczy
California
October 2nd, 2011
12:48 pm
But doesn't that free up people to do more interesting, creative work? Technological innovation only temporarily displaces some working people. History proves this without any reasonable doubt: With all the new technology around now, there are many more jobs than there used to be. So what are you whining about, good doctor?
 Recommend Recommended by 1 Reader
Henderson, Texas
October 2nd, 2011
12:49 pm
This is exactly what people said from '30 until '40: that the new, automated factories had replaced the skilled craftsmen with machines, so a much small number of unskilled, low paid workers could produce more than a much larger number of well-paid skilled craftsmen could produce, so there were no jobs, and hence no demand for what the factories produced. And no way out, the world would have to learn to live with permanent 20% unemployment.

This lasted until those two brilliant economists, Profs. Adolph Schicklegrüber and Tojo figured out a way to stimulate demand and achieve not just full employment, but over-employment, with governments forcing people who did not want or need to work into jobs deemed necessary for national survival.

The reason the stimulus was effective was not just the size (about 50% of the total GDP), but because it taxed the wealthy 50% of earned income and up to 91% of unearned income and used that money to create jobs for the poor and middle classes. A stimulus of the same size consisting of tax cuts for the wealthy would have had no such effect.
 Recommend Recommended by 4 Readers


Gail
Tampa, FL
October 2nd, 2011
12:51 pm
I'm now reading your book. I bought it after you stated, in your interview with Charlie Rose, that the book is for parents (I have two kids under the age of 8). Parents really do need to understand that the job market will be very different for our kids than it was for us. At the same time, you need to stress the importance of parents getting into the trenches with their kids, sitting with them when they do homework, making sure they're understanding things, challenging them, pushing them. It's easy for me to do because I was raised by authoritarian immigrant parents, but it doesn't come naturally to many American parents.
 Recommend Recommended by 4 Readers
NY
October 2nd, 2011
12:51 pm
One overlooked factor is that the new technology has greatly reduced the need for human labor. Corporations are making great profits without all the workers who were laid off. Without a surge in demand why should firms hire anyone?
 Recommend Recommended by 2 Readers
dar-es-salaam, tanzania
October 2nd, 2011
12:54 pm
The happiest of people don't necessarily have the best of everything .
They just make the most of everything.
People born before 1946 were called The Silent generation..
- People born between 1946 and 1959 are called The Baby Boomers.
- People born between 1960 and 1979 are called Generation X, ....
- And people born between 1980 and 2010 are called Generation Y ,
Why do we call the last group Generation Y?
Y should I get a job?
Y should I leave home and find my own place?
Y should I get a car when I can borrow yours?
Y should I clean my room?
Y should I wash and iron my own clothes?
Y should I buy any food?
But a cartoonist explained it very eloquently below...
cid:_2_0985DD700985D4E0002BF948422578AE
An old country preacher had a teenage son, and it was getting time
the boy should give some thought to choosing a profession.
Like many young men his age, the boy didn't really know what he
wanted to do,and he didn't seem too concerned about it.
One day, while the boy was away at school, his father decided to try
an experiment.
He went into the boy's room and placed on his study table four objects:
1. Bible
2. Silver Dollar
3. Bottle of Whisky
4. Playboy magazine
“I'll just hide behind the door”, the old preacher said to himself.
"When he comes home from school today, I'll see which object he picks
up."
"If it's the Bible, he's going to be a preacher like me, and what a
blessing that would be !”
"If he picks up the dollar, he's going to be a business man, and that
! would be okay, too.”
"But if he picks up the bottle, he's going to be a no-good drunken
bum, and Lord, what a shame that would be.”
"And worst of all if he picks up that magazine he's going to be a
skirt-chasing womanizer."
The old man waited anxiously, and soon heard his son's foot-steps as
he entered the house whistling and heading for his room.
The boy tossed his books on the bed, and as he turned to leave the
room he spotted the objects on the table.
With curiosity in his eye, he walked over to inspect them.
Finally, he picked up the Bible and placed it under his arm.
He picked up the silver dollar and dropped into his pocket.
He uncorked the bottle and took a big drink, while he admired the
magazine's centrefold.
" Lord have mercy”, the old preacher disgustedly whispered,
" He's going into politics!!"
That ends the economics and politics and I had a good laugh. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA
 Recommend Recommended by 4 Readers
Satya
NY
October 2nd, 2011
12:54 pm
My mentor back in India in 1990's taught us everyday -
"I am working hard ain't good enough...Work Hard, Work Smart". 

Today, I try to teach the same to our team in the US,, they get it, much better and much quicker than they used to in 2000. 

Thanks for spelling it out...
 Recommend Recommended by 2 Readers
Atlantic City, NJ
October 2nd, 2011
12:55 pm
I remember an automatic car wash in California that had robots in 1969. A gang of fearless robots gave some people a washing and these people were afraid! Oh well, gotta laugh and move on or wind up crying. Something says more bio information is still needed as compared to machine information yet the amount of machine information is accelerating. This planet needs a heart.
 Recommend Recommended by 0 Readers
Port Orange, FL
October 2nd, 2011
12:56 pm
For most people that world rots. At least in America, I would say 97% of the people want to work 9-5, Monday to Friday, have two weeks paid vacation and some overtime around Christmas. They don't want to be the boss or an entrepreneur. They don't want to bid $200 to design Australian chewing gum or Chinese rap songs. They want to work hard, go home, drink a beer and retire at 65. What they want can only realistically be achieved through manufacturing and construction jobs. Manufacturing has largely fled the country and construction is on a prolonged hiatus with the collapse of the housing bubble. A world where everyday they have to compete against everyone else to be the best and the brightest for an average bid of $57 means no security and no protection against mediocrity, sickness, old age or being just plain tired. Piece-work is ok when you're young and healthy and the best one at the shop. Not so good when you're forty and a new 21 year old is kicking your butt.
 Recommend Recommended by 23 Readers